22.02.2013 trainer by gmz

Page 3 of 8 12 3 45 Last »
02/27/2013 19:34 εdwárdº#31
so this hack is safe /?
02/27/2013 21:09 JohnHeatz#32
Quote:
Originally Posted by εdwárdº View Post
so this hack is safe /?
If it wasn't it wouldn't be posted
02/28/2013 06:07 jonad#33
Nobody knows what is the use of option F12?
02/28/2013 08:42 aeroaqua#34
f12
02/28/2013 11:39 εdwárdº#35
saying that cause have a lot of viruses..
02/28/2013 11:47 frezzbby#36
Quote:
Originally Posted by εdwárdº View Post
saying that cause have a lot of viruses..
is because of packer....
02/28/2013 21:42 metalloid#37
Quote:
Originally Posted by berkay2578 View Post
Which means he used a PE Mangler in order to protect his exe.
I have looked into this with IDA Q. And I can say that this thing is clean. It's the packer / mangler giving those false positives :)
Thanks for the clarification. I wonder why he uses this packing system, does he want
to prevent reversing? If he made sure that other game-hackers could see his code (even
if it's older versions) the patching ideas of other hackers could make the trainer better.

More eyeballs mean more brain-matter on the code and should result in a better tool,
at least IMHO.

I would pseudo-open source the code, making sure the game programmers don't see it
but true game-hackers would.
In the end we would have killer game-tools, developed by more than a one man army
02/28/2013 22:10 berkay2578#38
Quote:
Originally Posted by metalloid View Post
Thanks for the clarification. I wonder why he uses this packing system, does he want
to prevent reversing? If he made sure that other game-hackers could see his code (even
if it's older versions) the patching ideas of other hackers could make the trainer better.
He uses MASM so all you will get is a bunch of opcodes. Protecting it will make those opcodes look weird, lots of weird.
GMZ has nothing to be afraid of. "Developers" at EA can't even decompile a CE Trainer.
03/01/2013 05:32 iyah.cute15#39
virus -_-
03/01/2013 07:29 HerpyDerp666#40
Quote:
Originally Posted by iyah.cute15 View Post
virus -_-
Noob. Fake positive.
03/04/2013 01:38 AWaytoExpensive#41
PEiD keeps telling me there is no packer.
03/04/2013 16:38 berkay2578#42
Quote:
Originally Posted by AWaytoExpensive View Post
PEiD keeps telling me there is no packer.
PEiD is useless.. You have to find the packer he used by looking through it's bytes. Every packer has it's own specific bytes. Try IDA Q and you might find out which packer he uses.
03/04/2013 17:08 AWaytoExpensive#43
Quote:
Originally Posted by berkay2578 View Post
PEiD is useless.. You have to find the packer he used by looking through it's bytes. Every packer has it's own specific bytes. Try IDA Q and you might find out which packer he uses.
so you say PEID is useless? well its able to detect most of the best packers like Themdia or Armadillo.

anyway but i think this is more related to more serious stuff.

btw what is IDA Q? ive got here IDA6.1 Pro x32/x64?
03/04/2013 17:25 berkay2578#44
Quote:
Originally Posted by AWaytoExpensive View Post
so you say PEID is useless? well its able to detect most of the best packers like Themdia or Armadillo.

anyway but i think this is more related to more serious stuff.

btw what is IDA Q? ive got here IDA6.1 Pro x32/x64?
1) Everything can detect Themida or Armadillo. They use the same bytes for ages.

2) IDA Q Pro - Look at the exe file. You'll see "idaq.exe". For me IDA Q sounds better than IDA Pro.
03/05/2013 01:57 AWaytoExpensive#45
just wondering what is p2p lag mode doing?
creating lag we had after the fail patch?
Page 3 of 8 12 3 45 Last »