QOProxy 2

05/01/2009 05:40 Qonquer#31
Thanks to everyone who backed me. My 1 main problem which is on-going is that I am very very easily wound up. Getting a very intimate knowledge of the TQ game protocol while developing QO1-3 has allowed me to spot certain ways to exploit it. Yes it is true that people would most likely use QOP2 on QO3 if i released it here. Fact is that I am still having the odd random problem with d/c when jumping/walking Happens on average once every 10 minutes now when it certainly wasn't a few days ago and I wonder if TQ are now making ultra fine tuning to the timestamps. I have shared the speedhack tech with a top bot coder, maybe he can fine tune it enough to make it flawless i dunno. Right now QO3 has so many little niggly bugs it is taking all my time to patch them so QOP2 is standing still atm. I will however put the speedhack only version onto a proxy port so you guys can try it. If you are concerned about the security of your accounts I would suggest making a new account and logging in with that, you dont need a uber all +12 character to test a speedhack.

I'll post here with the port number when i'm reasonably happy with the jump timing.
05/01/2009 12:03 kibar#32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qonquer View Post
Thanks to everyone who backed me. My 1 main problem which is on-going is that I am very very easily wound up. Getting a very intimate knowledge of the TQ game protocol while developing QO1-3 has allowed me to spot certain ways to exploit it. Yes it is true that people would most likely use QOP2 on QO3 if i released it here. Fact is that I am still having the odd random problem with d/c when jumping/walking Happens on average once every 10 minutes now when it certainly wasn't a few days ago and I wonder if TQ are now making ultra fine tuning to the timestamps. I have shared the speedhack tech with a top bot coder, maybe he can fine tune it enough to make it flawless i dunno. Right now QO3 has so many little niggly bugs it is taking all my time to patch them so QOP2 is standing still atm. I will however put the speedhack only version onto a proxy port so you guys can try it. If you are concerned about the security of your accounts I would suggest making a new account and logging in with that, you dont need a uber all +12 character to test a speedhack.

I'll post here with the port number when i'm reasonably happy with the jump timing.
we're all waiting for realessing dude and don't fail us all :):)
05/01/2009 15:33 unknownone#33
Quote:
Originally Posted by swords View Post
Well theres one thing in that, that changes your entire statement... I WOULDN'T give my UR to anyone. He made the choice to release his source to people that he obviously shouldn't have trusted. Who's to say it won't happen again?

And I'm done arguing with you, as I respect you a lot. You may make the last statement telling everyone that the proxy will have no chance of keylogging at all, BUT when it all happens again and he maybe releases it to someone like Danny all over again, then what? Would an "I told you so" be necessary?

Aside from the 1-post leechers on this forum, I adore it. I think everyone on here has one sole purpose... To fack TQ up. I am just trying to protect something from happening all over again. Why, take the risk to endanger 300+ people and $1,000's of dollars of DBs bought on gear that accounts may once be hacked again?
What's that link in your sig then? To me, it looks like something pointing directly to your UR. If you think I need source code to stick some malware into your app, you are very much mistaken. My statement is still valid.

If someone wants to release a malware infected proxy, they don't need QoProxy to do it anyway. Most people capable are more than capable of writing their own, except most are mature enough to not bother. There's already working proxies around anyway. For example, I wrote an example C# proxy to demonstrate the latest encryptions to people. If someone releases their own proxy from it, it has nothing to do with me.

You'd really be better apologising than carrying on your meaningless bullshit. Any past event that happened with QOProxy is in no way related to Qonquer, and has nothing to do with this. If you suspect it to contain malware, provide some information to back up your accusations.

If it did happen to contain malware, it's of no concern to you, the people moderating the forum, or anyone else. You risk your account by downloading anything on this forum (And in particular, apps like your UR which are unreversable to the untrained hacker, are potentially far more dangerous).
05/01/2009 19:21 swords#34
I told you, I am done arguing with you. I guess stating my opinions on this forum is a crime now :rolleyes:.

My first post on this thread was a little over the top asking to delete it, I admit this. But the rest I'm only saying to people, download at a higher risk than other programs. I added the 'than other programs' because I knew I would be jumped on about 'every program on this forum is a risk blah blah'...

I will no longer post in this thread.
05/01/2009 22:13 kibar#35
Quote:
Originally Posted by swords View Post
I told you, I am done arguing with you. I guess stating my opinions on this forum is a crime now :rolleyes:.

My first post on this thread was a little over the top asking to delete it, I admit this. But the rest I'm only saying to people, download at a higher risk than other programs. I added the 'than other programs' because I knew I would be jumped on about 'every program on this forum is a risk blah blah'...

I will no longer post in this thread.
dude if there was a keylogger the managers gonna deal with it
they will remove the thread and banning him
so let him realess it even for checking
05/01/2009 23:09 mrringo#36
Quote:
Originally Posted by kibar View Post
dude if there was a keylogger the managers gonna deal with it
they will remove the thread and banning him
so let him realess it even for checking
I back up the for moving forwards argument.

Plenty of jerks post fake programs or working programs with obvious loggers or viruses in them, they dont even pass scans, and they are not always banned, on this forum its buyer beware, or more like leeacher beware ^^. That said, lol as previously stated far better than I could rephrase, if a keylogger was implanted, it would a) be custom b) not show up on virus scans c) therefore be downloaded by the 100's of leeches (myself included) and d) no one would know except the "5%" who knew how to decompile, and read java.

And here I was thinking my year of learning Java in computer science as a freshman was wasted =p does that mean I get to call myself one of the top 5%? o.0

I like to see new things, and the features and options Qonquer is talking about are sweet as hell.

/testdrive

This message endorsed by me :D
05/02/2009 09:19 blackirby#37
u guys need to learn to follow what hes trying to say. he purposely put a logger in it incase it was leached out so no one would Dl it cause it was his own personal work he wanted kept between his friends. so if he plans on releasing this one to the public there wont be a keylogger in this version
05/02/2009 11:00 .bmg#38
@Qounquer: Proxy please ^^!
05/02/2009 18:15 wsuo#39
:o you know, to be honest... you should really make people pay like 1 dollar for it.

If people don't appreciate your work, why let them use it.
05/02/2009 18:37 hok30#40
Quote:
Originally Posted by wsuo View Post
:o you know, to be honest... you should really make people pay like 1 dollar for it.

If people don't appreciate your work, why let them use it.
-.-
05/02/2009 18:46 tuning20002010#41
how can i get it?
05/02/2009 18:48 tuning20002010#42
HOW CAN I GET IT?
05/03/2009 14:28 .bmg#43
prolly not by making double posts :0!
05/04/2009 04:52 duda.nihon#44
POST THE DOWNLOAD!!!! :rtfm:
05/04/2009 07:49 lango#45
=/