O_O But I already did soo much.. :P Just csro has some stupid moveing packet :S There is "01" for "has destination" and another "01" for "has source" :S That i get messed up because in "has source" there are floats or whatever.. :PQuote:
but all yours working on nothing.. its my thing.
oke send me i can analyzing packet for you but only movement :PQuote:
O_O But I already did soo much.. :P Just csro has some stupid moveing packet :S There is "01" for "has destination" and another "01" for "has source" :S That i get messed up because in "has source" there are floats or whatever.. :P
Me 2,Quote:
hmm, i still don't understand why eSRO team changed from iSRO>cSRO
it would be so much easier to code iSRO =/
was it to do with cSRO being a lot more up to date?
No sorry but..Quote:
Me 2,
as you say you could open a ISRO server and get all of it's benefits right away, and than think for changing to KSRO, but you don't do anything but releasing some videos that can be nothing more than a media edit lol .
You only believe in those who release something >.> Typical.. Well it's great that Lyzerk will not release anything now :) People should stop leaching and try to do something for the self..Quote:
So for now I belive that only Lyzerk is working on smth, SREmu have some files and progress but with their speed we will see a result in 4 years from now :D
WRONG!Quote:
And btw there is no stupid or easy programming language - it's just the one that's using it...
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]Quote:
No sorry but..
1. We're on CSRO not KSRO
KSRO too much security in packets >.< IT SUCKS! :D But it gets more updates :PQuote:
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
Ok seems like you decided then not to move from CSRO to KSRO, but why? Aren't the packets easier than CSRO? And KSRO is better than CSRO anyways, isn't it?
Thanks for quoting my post, but we have since moved back to cSRO as [stated above], kSRO has some difficult authentication packets that make it quite difficult for Wind to work on/around. cSRO on the other hand, has superfluous packets that are crammed with "fat" that isn't necessary, kSRO doesn't but with that authentication in the way, there's not much they can do so cSRO is the best option.Quote:
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
Ok seems like you decided then not to move from CSRO to KSRO, but why? Aren't the packets easier than CSRO? And KSRO is better than CSRO anyways, isn't it?
ok - so u say that but what does that truly mean?Quote:
Thanks for quoting my post, but we have since moved back to cSRO as [stated above], kSRO has some difficult authentication packets that make it quite difficult for Wind to work on/around. cSRO on the other hand, has superfluous packets that are crammed with "fat" that isn't necessary, kSRO doesn't but with that authentication in the way, there's not much they can do so cSRO is the best option.