I have been testing AA/IW/PO over the past week but cannot decide which one to go for.
AA
Of all the providers, I personally find AA's aimbot to be my favorite. When using a legit config, the aimbot feels so good to use and is smooth.
Although it can be confusing to configure at first, after reading through the FW post on the forum, it becomes quite easy to customise all the features.
A lot of the configuration is either done in Notepad or the console. If you only use the GUI to configure your settings, it can be quite underwhelming, so definitely pays off to read how to use the framework properly.
However, I am quite disappointed that 2DRadar and 3DRadar colors are tied together. This means that I am unable to configure it so that my 2DRadar acts as a "perma-UAV", while my 3DRadar is set to only show ESP when enemy is visible. By setting the opacity of enemies not visible to 0, this also affects the 2DRadar and thus making the "perma-UAV" radar option not possible.
There are 2DRadar configs in the forum but switching between MP and WZ can be a hassle as you'll be required to reconfigure your radar or load another config.
IW
With IW, it is much easier to configure compared to AA. Honestly, there is nothing negative to say about IW. The aimbot has some pretty cool humanisation features, such as aim curve, target delay and deadzone. Though, I don't think the humanisation features are necessary to achieve a legit looking aimbot. You can also set a secondary aimkey which is a pretty neat feature.
IW also offers visible-only ESP, and configuring the radar is straightforward compared to the other two providers. Simply ticking the option sets it up, making it compatible with all resolutions.
Additionally, users have the option to propose new features, and members can vote on the suggestions. The release notes for IW also highlight the ongoing enhancements they make to their product.
PO
PO was the first provider I tried and it's a good experience overall. However, one feature that PO does not have but AA and IW have is a triggerbot. This makes it quite hard to use semi-auto weapons and snipers with PO - particularly if you use M1 as the aimbot hotkey.
The aimbot feels strong, yet weak at the same time. The aimbot can feel sticky, yet it misses of shots, especially when enemies are strafing or sprinting.
Using an aim hotkey other than M1 makes the aimbot look quite sticky.
My dilemma:
AA has the best feeling aimbot and HelioS has been around forever, so I feel like I can trust him and AA security-wise.
However, the 2DRadar and 3DRadar color/opacity being linked together is kind of a dealbreaker - I don't trust myself enough to not look through walls if non-visible enemies are showing.
IW has everything I need but for some irrational reason, I don't feel as safe when using IW compared to AA and PO.
PO is missing a triggerbot and were detected the most recently of the three providers. But for some reason, I trust Zeb and feel safer when using PO compared to IW.
Sorry for the long-winded post, I not sure who to go with and would appreciate some opinions.
AA
Of all the providers, I personally find AA's aimbot to be my favorite. When using a legit config, the aimbot feels so good to use and is smooth.
Although it can be confusing to configure at first, after reading through the FW post on the forum, it becomes quite easy to customise all the features.
A lot of the configuration is either done in Notepad or the console. If you only use the GUI to configure your settings, it can be quite underwhelming, so definitely pays off to read how to use the framework properly.
However, I am quite disappointed that 2DRadar and 3DRadar colors are tied together. This means that I am unable to configure it so that my 2DRadar acts as a "perma-UAV", while my 3DRadar is set to only show ESP when enemy is visible. By setting the opacity of enemies not visible to 0, this also affects the 2DRadar and thus making the "perma-UAV" radar option not possible.
There are 2DRadar configs in the forum but switching between MP and WZ can be a hassle as you'll be required to reconfigure your radar or load another config.
IW
With IW, it is much easier to configure compared to AA. Honestly, there is nothing negative to say about IW. The aimbot has some pretty cool humanisation features, such as aim curve, target delay and deadzone. Though, I don't think the humanisation features are necessary to achieve a legit looking aimbot. You can also set a secondary aimkey which is a pretty neat feature.
IW also offers visible-only ESP, and configuring the radar is straightforward compared to the other two providers. Simply ticking the option sets it up, making it compatible with all resolutions.
Additionally, users have the option to propose new features, and members can vote on the suggestions. The release notes for IW also highlight the ongoing enhancements they make to their product.
PO
PO was the first provider I tried and it's a good experience overall. However, one feature that PO does not have but AA and IW have is a triggerbot. This makes it quite hard to use semi-auto weapons and snipers with PO - particularly if you use M1 as the aimbot hotkey.
The aimbot feels strong, yet weak at the same time. The aimbot can feel sticky, yet it misses of shots, especially when enemies are strafing or sprinting.
Using an aim hotkey other than M1 makes the aimbot look quite sticky.
My dilemma:
AA has the best feeling aimbot and HelioS has been around forever, so I feel like I can trust him and AA security-wise.
However, the 2DRadar and 3DRadar color/opacity being linked together is kind of a dealbreaker - I don't trust myself enough to not look through walls if non-visible enemies are showing.
IW has everything I need but for some irrational reason, I don't feel as safe when using IW compared to AA and PO.
PO is missing a triggerbot and were detected the most recently of the three providers. But for some reason, I trust Zeb and feel safer when using PO compared to IW.
Sorry for the long-winded post, I not sure who to go with and would appreciate some opinions.
