Quote:
Originally Posted by theoneofgod
Get some knowledge of the forum first before accusing rumata of infecting users, do you honestly think IF he wanted to, it would be detected??
PS: If the loader was built to steal account information, it would not be on the forum.
|
1/ "get some knowledge of the forum first."
I have some, I have browsed this thread a long time before I first downloaded from it months ago, then I checked out the last pages after release each time I downloaded again, and that amounts to about 10 releases.
How much knowledge and what knowledge in particular you think I would need before either trusting (bad move) or rejecting the loader based on suspicions of a virus?
I post the virus check as a warning and wait for replies. Here comes your reply with nothing substantial to contradict my suspicions and/or claims.
If you have any proof that it's only a false positive, just post it.
2/ "do you honestly think IF he wanted to, it would be detected??"
That's supposed to determine my choice of using a suspicious file? The belief that Rumata would be able to include an undetectable trojan in his program?
We're talking security here, not religion. Belief isn't an option except for suckers.
3/ (your generic quote about false positives.)
Completely redundant as the term "false positives" explains it well enough.
There again, you think your simple claim that it is a false positive, and the explanation of what it means, should be enough to prove that it is one?
4/ And finally "If the loader was built to steal account information, it would not be on the forum."
If you intended this to be a last argument, that one's called an 'argument out of authority'. It's a fallacy. It doesn't prove anything.
So where are you standing? Deluded and/or deluder?
Bring me some valid points if you want to prove your claim.