Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. The leaders make products and features that others "knock-off" all the time. So if the issue is just similar features then be happy you had them first.
But if what Immons says about code being literally
copied then I don't think that is right. xmast denies that and Immons claims methods are named exactly the same. Depending on which methods, it might indicate strongly that the code is copied. However, if it is something like "ReadUInt" then it isn't evidence of copied code and I agree with xmast.
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidreece
arent all bots made using hacks from codes stolen from aion
|
Making cheats for a video game only uses memory offsets and process module base address, the real value in a "bot" is the UI and the provided functionality; it isn't a copy of the game in any way unless we're talking about a bot that is abstracted to the packet level with full client emulation (which none of these are). So I think that comparison is apples-to-oranges. Copying small values out of memory are only data points which the software operates on; it isn't like a bot is a cracked copy of the game or something.
In any case, I think dragging the issue out here isn't productive. I posted the offsets used for this bot trying to make the community a better place so hopefully everyone can keep things civil and respect each others' work (non-judgmental).
Immons - you should keep innovating and bringing your users new features; if you continue to lead then people will continue to be happy paying for your work... spending time here won't help though
xmast - you should try to outdo Immons and surpass him with some fresh new ideas for your users :)
Ready? Go!