Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotreks34
However, it isnt possible that imagesearch bot is better than any packet bot.
|
This is not impossible.. I saw your title so i think you are a C# programmer.
I think you know that a packet bot is not just sending the packet for moving and collecting. Packetbot need to send packet to moving, collecting, shot npc, lock npc. So basically a packet bot need to SEND all packet related with your normal inputs in game. And need to RECIVE the position of other players, stats about them, npc position and stats etc... Okay C# like other .NET languages have the possibility to use multithreding etc..
Okay now we can analize the work that a pixelbot need to do. I need to search pixel of box this take about 70ms. And imagesearch for NPC or Tag need 80 ms for each one. So 70 + 80 + 80 + 80 (box+npc+boss+tag) = 310 ms. To check HP I personally use Pixels so we can add 70 ms, with mouseclicks, if...then..else, etc.. that take a bit of time we can say that a pixelbot can use less than a second to make all action that it need without multithreading.
I'm not much expert of .NET programming, yes i know vb.NET but not like jD or Sinlyu or like every good programmer here. But i know very well autoit and i can tell you that i'm sure at 99,9% that a pixelbot made in autoit can be compared to a Packetbot if is done well.