snitch :(Quote:
He's talking about ultimate and mek
I had a great time on ec (nov 2024-2025), I did have a few things that I did not like, however bans were never an issue.
[UNOFFICIAL] List Of Legit and Scam Providers List
11/20/2025 22:14
divisioncheats#3301
11/20/2025 22:18
theme#3302
port gambling to mek and ultimate, also is this woody or inno ?Quote:
11/20/2025 22:22
Starlightrust#3303
when i was on it Bans on FP were a issue and friend that are on EC arent logging on FP as well cause they scared they finna get bannnedQuote:
I had a great time on ec (nov 2024-2025), I did have a few things that I did not like, however bans were never an issue.
11/20/2025 22:24
theme#3304
Yeah I heard about that, never had an issue as I stopped playing facepunch due to the amount of admins on there.Quote:
How did I forget about this...Quote:
Not to mention the past does NOT define the present.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
how on earth are yall going to say division is more feature rich then matrix :(
"Matrix Rust Cheat — Lean, user-friendly, focuses on reliable Rust Aimbot and Rust ESP with low performance impact.
Division Rust Cheats — Broader feature set, more frequent updates, stronger emphasis on anti-detection and hybrid protection systems."
At least be honest
11/20/2025 22:41
divisioncheats#3305
woodyQuote:
11/20/2025 23:47
theme#3306
tell austin to get his shit together, we watched him get instant detected on arc raiders in rust gooner discordQuote:
11/21/2025 00:20
fednd#3307
Last time i used it just kept getting hit on facepunch even if the issue is fixed now it took multiple months to fix it when other providers fixed it within same day poor update times to and quality of the cheat i have even seen the cheat recently too does not look like it has changed much since.Quote:
I had a great time on ec (nov 2024-2025), I did have a few things that I did not like, however bans were never an issue.
11/21/2025 00:37
divisioncheats#3308
Quote:
Been cheating hard for 4 days no issues. No clue what you are talking about G
11/23/2025 01:44
Mamardashvili#3309
Fuck evilcheats, trash cheat, always has been and always will be
11/23/2025 04:24
andria2#3310
Ignite external dtc and support is not responding. Please remove from UD
11/23/2025 05:43
theme#3311
Can anyone back this up?Quote:
edit: nvm got this confused with another cheat
11/23/2025 13:36
alexpsp00#3312
matrix internal is now in testing after recent detection
11/24/2025 01:46
theme#3313
Just confirmed with loader dev he said it’s UD.Quote:
11/24/2025 01:49
divisioncheats#3314
I want to clear up a few things because the way Division is being framed right now doesn’t match reality or the standards used for other providers on the list.
The “multiple detections” are the same detection counted over and over.
Whoever logged the dates clearly watched the ban-rate day by day and marked every delayed ban as a new “detection.”
Any provider that gets detected will have delayed bans for days or weeks after the first wave. That is 100% normal, not multiple separate detections, and shows the owner of the list is uneducated.
If that same measurement method was used for every provider, their detection history would look just like ours (and many much worse).
The list isn’t using the same standard across all products.
For Division, isolated user reports suddenly count as fact.
But when Chudvision got detected, it took many people repeatedly telling the list owner before the status was finally updated.
If the list is “based on users’ experience,” it needs to be applied consistently, not selectively.
The rumor about a “malicious panel/tool” has nothing to do with Division.
We have never done anything malicious, and we never will.
The craziest part is that the actual provider involved in that situation is still listed on his list while Division is the one labeled for it. That alone shows that the narrative is not neutral.
The Discord word-filtering situation is being exaggerated.
Yes, words like “ban/detected” were filtered temporarily, but that was done by one staff member without approval and that person is no longer on the team. Acting like this was some company-wide plan is unfair and inaccurate.
Longevity is never mentioned.
Division is now one of the oldest providers still active on that list (May of 2023 and still going).
If the list actually reflected user history objectively, surviving years of updates and banwaves would matter, but only negative framing is highlighted.
To be clear: we aren’t asking for favoritism.
We’re asking for equal standards across the board.
If detection tracking is based on actual detections, if user feedback is applied consistently, and if rumors aren’t presented as fact only when it involves Division, then the list becomes meaningful again.
Right now, the way info is displayed makes it very obvious that Division is treated differently than the rest.
Not to mention, they did not specify what they considered detected. The ban percentage is percent, the amount of users causes that to fluctuate.
In summary, we are getting punished relentlessly for attempting to be as transparent to our customers which no one other cheat has done in the past.
I highly suggest you scroll through our discord vouches, you will see endless positive ones and even the negative ones as we NEVER remove any vouch.
edit:
Not to mention, he has two of our rebranded providers listed as trusted / undetected, while KNOWING they are Division backend supported / coded by us.
Based on the way his current list is tier, the long term providers are going to be the ones who have the worst trust.
The “multiple detections” are the same detection counted over and over.
Whoever logged the dates clearly watched the ban-rate day by day and marked every delayed ban as a new “detection.”
Any provider that gets detected will have delayed bans for days or weeks after the first wave. That is 100% normal, not multiple separate detections, and shows the owner of the list is uneducated.
If that same measurement method was used for every provider, their detection history would look just like ours (and many much worse).
The list isn’t using the same standard across all products.
For Division, isolated user reports suddenly count as fact.
But when Chudvision got detected, it took many people repeatedly telling the list owner before the status was finally updated.
If the list is “based on users’ experience,” it needs to be applied consistently, not selectively.
The rumor about a “malicious panel/tool” has nothing to do with Division.
We have never done anything malicious, and we never will.
The craziest part is that the actual provider involved in that situation is still listed on his list while Division is the one labeled for it. That alone shows that the narrative is not neutral.
The Discord word-filtering situation is being exaggerated.
Yes, words like “ban/detected” were filtered temporarily, but that was done by one staff member without approval and that person is no longer on the team. Acting like this was some company-wide plan is unfair and inaccurate.
Longevity is never mentioned.
Division is now one of the oldest providers still active on that list (May of 2023 and still going).
If the list actually reflected user history objectively, surviving years of updates and banwaves would matter, but only negative framing is highlighted.
To be clear: we aren’t asking for favoritism.
We’re asking for equal standards across the board.
If detection tracking is based on actual detections, if user feedback is applied consistently, and if rumors aren’t presented as fact only when it involves Division, then the list becomes meaningful again.
Right now, the way info is displayed makes it very obvious that Division is treated differently than the rest.
Not to mention, they did not specify what they considered detected. The ban percentage is percent, the amount of users causes that to fluctuate.
In summary, we are getting punished relentlessly for attempting to be as transparent to our customers which no one other cheat has done in the past.
I highly suggest you scroll through our discord vouches, you will see endless positive ones and even the negative ones as we NEVER remove any vouch.
edit:
Not to mention, he has two of our rebranded providers listed as trusted / undetected, while KNOWING they are Division backend supported / coded by us.
Based on the way his current list is tier, the long term providers are going to be the ones who have the worst trust.
11/24/2025 03:35
HVH_KINGPIN_NN_BLASTER#3315
using an AI to generate your request, while also insulting the list owner?Quote:
if you cannot spend the 5 minutes to write up some text asking for your placement to be changed, what makes anyone think you will spend those 5 minutes making your cheat not shit?
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]