He's busy with school, but I see him on MSN every now and then.Quote:
isnt nullable pretty much done with conquer ?
This community
05/01/2012 22:19
Lateralus#301
05/01/2012 22:34
InfamousNoone#302
Ok so revising the list once again,
If anyone has an objections/further suggestions feel free to contribute.Quote:
Ultimation
_DreadNought_
unknownone (despite inactivity)
Korvacs
Lateralus
bone-you
InfamousNoone
Fang
CptSky
pro4never
Mr.Pop
Kiyono
ntl3fty
IAmHawtness <33333
Nullable
ImmuneOne
Haydz
05/01/2012 22:34
U2_Caparzo#303
spanish forums too, so ALL the posts are to see the download or the thread (u can hide them) like "Thanks", "Good job" or spam, u will never see nothing like "u could improve that if u change...." or "that is a bad way to make it, u should do....". the only reason why i stay there is because is my native languaje, and because here ppl really enjoy say to the ppl "Stop using that crappy source" (NCOs) lOlQuote:
05/01/2012 22:45
Captivate#304
All caring about the community and stuff, yet you're willing to be a 'leader' of a section that keeps things apart from the so called community.Quote:
Excuse me if I misinterpret, I'm kinda tired.
05/01/2012 22:51
turk55#305
i think that is pretty much it.Quote:
If anyone has an objections/further suggestions feel free to contribute.
05/01/2012 23:05
bone-you#306
The issue is the system as it is now practically prevents anyone new from being shared anything. A revised setup with people willing to share would change that. While it wouldn't be entirely open, it'd be far more structured allowing people to strive to be a part of something rather than piss in the dark and hope they hit the spot.Quote:
Excuse me if I misinterpret, I'm kinda tired.
05/01/2012 23:18
Captivate#307
Well when I see that list, what I see are the currently active 'respected (somehow subjective obviously)' members from the conquer online section. Personally I wouldn't strive being part of that group, because I know that by the time I would be able to compete with them Conquer would probably be a dead game.
The standards of such section should be lowered (people like Jacob should definitely be on the list in my opinion) or there would be no difference with the current situation since all those people most likely have contact with each other already.
The standards of such section should be lowered (people like Jacob should definitely be on the list in my opinion) or there would be no difference with the current situation since all those people most likely have contact with each other already.
05/01/2012 23:22
I don't have a username#308
and me? :rolleyes:Quote:
If anyone has an objections/further suggestions feel free to contribute.
You're forgetting the big shot:
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
Also what about:
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
05/01/2012 23:26
bone-you#309
Remember there are 2 groups. UG and Lv2. Ideally, to appease the people who want the secrets safeguarded so well, Lv2 would probably be the best place to dish them out as it'd be the "most exclusive" section. There'd have to be a reasonable way to get into it though to make it fair for those who don't have it though. If people would rather UG be the place for it, doesn't matter. Either way.Quote:
The standards of such section should be lowered (people like Jacob should definitely be on the list in my opinion) or there would be no difference with the current situation since all those people most likely have contact with each other already.
05/01/2012 23:28
InfamousNoone#310
UG List:
Lv2. List:
Once again, if I'm forgetting anyone/objections/etc.
Perhaps UG as the lowest, getting in is done through peer recommendation:
i.e. IAmHawtness post's a thread "[New Member] NAME", the people who have access to the section give their input about the person, whether they think they should be let in etc. A democratic decision is achieved finally through a vote (though a poll in the thread). The end result is then submitted to the administrators by the leader(s) of the section.
Lv 2. on the other hand would be peer-recommended from UG and would likely contain more 'keep-safe' information among the developers. We could also have some sort of standard "test" developed for people who're considered for Lv. 2.
** meaning "if they ever return and want access"Quote:
Ultimation
_DreadNought_
unknownone **
Korvacs
Lateralus
bone-you
InfamousNoone
Fang
CptSky
pro4never
Mr.Pop
Kiyono
ntl3fty
IAmHawtness <33333
Nullable **
Tanelipe **
ImmuneOne
Haydz
I don't have a username
-impulse- (no idea what his name is on e*pvp)
Lv2. List:
Code:
Korvacs bone-you InfamousNoone Ultimation unknownone ** Haydz IAmHawtness
Perhaps UG as the lowest, getting in is done through peer recommendation:
i.e. IAmHawtness post's a thread "[New Member] NAME", the people who have access to the section give their input about the person, whether they think they should be let in etc. A democratic decision is achieved finally through a vote (though a poll in the thread). The end result is then submitted to the administrators by the leader(s) of the section.
Lv 2. on the other hand would be peer-recommended from UG and would likely contain more 'keep-safe' information among the developers. We could also have some sort of standard "test" developed for people who're considered for Lv. 2.
05/01/2012 23:31
m7mdxlife#311
{ Angelius }
05/01/2012 23:33
I don't have a username#312
I edited my post if you didnt notice Hybrid.
05/01/2012 23:34
bone-you#313
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]Quote:
..
sorry, couldn't resist that one.
But yea, that's how UG has worked up until it went dormant as Korvacs can tell you as well since he made pretty much all the new member threads for a while up until then lol.
05/01/2012 23:38
×Holo#314
pretty good, go4it.Quote:
Ultimation
_DreadNought_
unknownone (despite inactivity)
Korvacs
Lateralus
bone-you
InfamousNoone
Fang
CptSky
pro4never
Mr.Pop
Kiyono
ntl3fty
IAmHawtness <33333
Nullable
ImmuneOne
Haydz
I don't have a username
-impulse-
05/01/2012 23:40
_DreadNought_#315
-Impulse- is correct.Quote:
Perhaps UG as the lowest, getting in is done through peer recommendation:
i.e. IAmHawtness post's a thread "[New Member] NAME", the people who have access to the section give their input about the person, whether they think they should be let in etc. A democratic decision is achieved finally through a vote (though a poll in the thread). The end result is then submitted to the administrators by the leader(s) of the section.
Lv 2. on the other hand would be peer-recommended from UG and would likely contain more 'keep-safe' information among the developers. We could also have some sort of standard "test" developed for people who're considered for Lv. 2.
I don't know if Justin(lostsoldier05) still looks at this section but if he does he could possibly be a good candidate. note: possibly, I dont really know him but from what i've seen....
Alright your idea is all good and all, but what do the admins have to say about this? They haven't actually said yes or no(or did they, I forget), but theres no point getting "ahead of yourself" (No disrespect intended<3) if the idea wouldnt be considered anyway.
But I read the admins post hours ago and theres been like another 100 replys so I forget.
#edit
And if nullable does return he should defiantly be in for Level 2, And maybe even Fang, he's discovered alot of cool shit nobody had found before him.