memory + packet

07/18/2007 00:51 KamikadZee#16
well i still dont get how to use yours bot JAMES so beter s.t.f.u
just plzmake it faster dude
i whant up blader i hate force blader ;/////
07/18/2007 02:24 tribond#17
same :)hellow all
07/18/2007 02:52 Veg#18
Quote:
Originally posted by xJAMESx@Jul 17 2007, 22:02
when you uplaod the bypass?
have you a cabal trainer?

yeah^^
People like you, who lurk around the CheatEngine forums asking for a goddamn speedhack table, will fail while assembling the .exe.
07/18/2007 08:01 Alfarjamie#19
This guy talking out his ass..

hit rate doesnt increase range.. dex doesnt increase attack speed what the fuck is he talking about, hes gotta stop playing ro.
07/18/2007 10:22 Jam3s1#20
Quote:
Originally posted by KamikadZee@Jul 18 2007, 00:51
well i still dont get how to use yours bot JAMES so beter s.t.f.u
just plzmake it faster dude
i whant up blader i hate force blader ;/////
you dont check my tutorial, so yor problem

the bot works grat for some people
07/18/2007 10:55 syntex#21
you dont check my tutorial?

btw. Pixelbots are sucking , I try to make one over Memory / Packets ...
07/18/2007 11:58 KamikadZee#22
agree with you Pixelbots are sucking
i try it it's work but better hand bot
07/23/2007 14:12 NetWolf#23
[edit] delete me pls
07/25/2007 16:12 NetWolf#24
mmk
i was searching for the address of skill delays
but i kinda need a better starting point :S

for which kind of values should i search?
float 4 byte? or what?
damn 400 million addresses x_X thats pain for my computer and brain :(

i also found it rather difficult to isolate a skill cause the scan wouldnt be completed before the skill is available again -.-"

like you activate a skill start the scan to find a difference but before the scan is completed the skill is where it was at the beginning :S
does anyone have a better computer to check on that? :(
07/25/2007 18:17 pokey2#25
Quote:
Originally posted by syntex@Jul 18 2007, 10:55
you dont check my tutorial?

btw. Pixelbots are sucking , I try to make one over Memory / Packets ...
Due to the lack of packet based bots, all we CAN have is pixel based bots. And they are way better than doing it manually.
07/28/2007 22:13 yabco#26
Quote:
Originally posted by Veg@Jul 17 2007, 17:53
Don't get your hopes up, this one is gonna be closed source and private. I may post a tutorial on how to change/add various pointers and jumpers in the code next week, so you can code your own cabalmain.exe, but that's it.
so what about that tutorial?
07/28/2007 22:28 syntex#27
Quote:
Originally posted by pokey2+Jul 25 2007, 18:17--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (pokey2 @ Jul 25 2007, 18:17)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--syntex@Jul 18 2007, 10:55
you dont check my tutorial?

btw. Pixelbots are sucking , I try to make one over Memory / Packets ...
Due to the lack of packet based bots, all we CAN have is pixel based bots. And they are way better than doing it manually. [/b][/quote]
hahaha are you kidding?
we only can have a pixelbot .ohmygodness

if I had some spare time I would make one , the packets are decrypted easly so better close ya mouth b4 you say anything :x