mBot vs. Sbot

11/24/2010 11:23 ferdylols#16
true, but sroking has not that good of option if you ask me, and also the bot looks cheap and crap. Sbot is good and reliable, but still no clientless anymore. Also the registration is bad, and buying accounts isn't worth it. Phbot is good and cheap but has a lot of buggs right now and doesn't fixed as properly as it was.

Mbot wich i'm using atm, is good and fast, the stuck thing is getting better every update, and as i'm grinding in jg cave, i don't have problems with getting stuck, the config is ok, but not so expended, i like it yes, but phbot and sbot are better.

I'm still in for Phbot although it's missing a few functions in my behalf. So my vote is Phbot, or Sbot, so for this thread, Sbot..
11/26/2010 18:28 intercsaki#17
I bet mBot will come up to Sbot, because of such features which are not included in Sbot.
For isro mbot is rather new, so there is time.

Yea I was dumb about that clientless thing... I don't play isro. :) Does mBot have clientless? And btw, its easier to recharge than Sbot (someone said it above, he's right).
11/27/2010 15:26 __Karin__#18
No only Phbot has clientless I believe ibot has it too, and yes mbot is easier to charge.