good no fixes pls
so u have records or the old packets and memory adress? can u post them or email them to me?Quote:
Originally posted by andyd123@Dec 14 2006, 00:50
Listen, that is a problem, but not anything near the only way QOProxy was disabled.
For the sake that nobody fixes this piece of crap, I will not release what packets changed, nor what mem-addresses changed.
Do not ask for qoproxy.
Do not ask for people to fix it.
If you want it that bad, study java for a year, study packet decryption and encryption, and make your own.
I believe you could do it Tiger, but plx, let 'er die.Quote:
Originally posted by xBlacKTigeRx@Dec 13 2006, 23:35
that part takes about 2 minutes from opening the source to fix...
Overall, I hoped to have it fixed 72 hrs after the patch....It only took me 12 or so...
I will not be posting it, nor will I be using it...
I hope everyone else who fixes it has the common sense to keep it private...
You sir, are a dumb***. Walking packet changed? Why don't you record the packet and compare it, and get some correct facts before assuming what isn't true.Quote:
Originally posted by k4g4m1@Dec 14 2006, 00:35
it has nothing to do with the 2 item spots as they are only visual in other words. TQ didnt implement them yet they only updated the interface.this time it seems they changed the walk packets :) I havent look into it yet. But I wont realese it to public. If u want to aimbot fix it urself. No more leeching.
You sir, are a dumb***. Walking packet changed? Why don't you record the packet and compare it, and get some correct facts before assuming what isn't true.Quote:
Originally posted by iliveoncaffiene+Dec 14 2006, 03:21--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (iliveoncaffiene @ Dec 14 2006, 03:21)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--k4g4m1@Dec 14 2006, 00:35
it has nothing to do with the 2 item spots as they are only visual in other words. TQ didnt implement them yet they only updated the interface.this time it seems they changed the walk packets :) I havent look into it yet. But I wont realese it to public. If u want to aimbot fix it urself. No more leeching.
You sir, are a dumb***. Walking packet changed? Why don't you record the packet and compare it, and get some correct facts before assuming what isn't true.Quote:
Originally posted by iliveoncaffiene+Dec 14 2006, 03:21--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (iliveoncaffiene @ Dec 14 2006, 03:21)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--k4g4m1@Dec 14 2006, 00:35
it has nothing to do with the 2 item spots as they are only visual in other words. TQ didnt implement them yet they only updated the interface.this time it seems they changed the walk packets :) I havent look into it yet. But I wont realese it to public. If u want to aimbot fix it urself. No more leeching.