Eh nope 0.oQuote:
The applicant's thanks-to-post-count ratio is greater than yours, and in fact, greater than quite a few other moderator's.
I believe that if someone has the indecency to tell you that your application is bad or too short and not further explicate the reason they are saying so, then they most likely don't have the intelligence necessary to pursue a moderator's position either.
A common flaw in a lot of answers is that some do not use proof to back up their claims. For example: you chose to acknowledge that there are issues or current topics that are active in the section that you are applying for, and that you know them well, but you could further-prove your knowledge in that area by providing an example or two. This flaw is prevalent in most of your answers. Your application does not need to be long, but terse if you wish.
What I would like to see out of my moderators, is an ability to to correctly and fully spell out their words and sentences. Perfect grammar is most definitely not required, but I would encourage the moderators to display their ability to effectively construct their sentences in a professional manner. It is something that is unfortunately not often done, but it makes communication much easier for us, and it makes us feel that we're not dealing with an incompetent moderator.
I believe that you are not yet mature and knowledgeable enough to moderate this forum, but perhaps you could try again when there are moderating positions available.
Only better join date, that even beats mine.