Legit settings all day any day. Security should already be an unspoken rule :handsdown:
Safety is mandatory, everything else is secondary. By the way, I feel you should reconsider the price of your Call of Duty chair; $66 is excessive, $40 or $45 is more reasonable.Quote:
Hello,
We’re thinking about re-entering the COD market now that we’ve finally stabilised our product lineup and backend properly.
Before we officially launch anything, we’re planning to open up a 14 day free trial so people can test it properly and give feedback.
Wanted to ask the community first though, what are the current must-have features for a solid COD product nowadays?
What matters most to you guys?
Legit settings?
Rage features?
Streamproof?
Controller support?
Spoofer integration?
Unlock tools?
BO7 / Warzone specific features?
Curious what people actually care about most currently before we move further with it.
Appreciate the feedback, and you're not the only one who's raised the pricing point, so worth addressing it directly! The $66 price isn't a mistake or us misreading the market. It's intentional. We've deliberately priced above the average to limit the user base and keep distribution tight.Quote:
Safety is mandatory, everything else is secondary. By the way, I feel you should reconsider the price of your Call of Duty chair; $66 is excessive, $40 or $45 is more reasonable.
Like activision actually care to spend 66 bucks to buy and sig it.Quote:
Appreciate the feedback, and you're not the only one who's raised the pricing point, so worth addressing it directly! The $66 price isn't a mistake or us misreading the market. It's intentional. We've deliberately priced above the average to limit the user base and keep distribution tight.
On the safety side, you're speaking our language! The majority of dev time on this release has gone into security, that's where the investment is, and that's what the price reflects. We'd rather have a smaller, well-protected user base than a packed one running on borrowed time.
I think a slot system is simpler and more functional for maintaining a small user base; the high price isn't an impediment for Activision to try and analyze it, as the other user said.Quote:
Appreciate the feedback, and you're not the only one who's raised the pricing point, so worth addressing it directly! The $66 price isn't a mistake or us misreading the market. It's intentional. We've deliberately priced above the average to limit the user base and keep distribution tight.
On the safety side, you're speaking our language! The majority of dev time on this release has gone into security, that's where the investment is, and that's what the price reflects. We'd rather have a smaller, well-protected user base than a packed one running on borrowed time.
If you can get unlock tools to work without getting banned, which is hard nowadays, it's an instant buy for me.Quote:
Hello,
We’re thinking about re-entering the COD market now that we’ve finally stabilised our product lineup and backend properly.
Before we officially launch anything, we’re planning to open up a 14 day free trial so people can test it properly and give feedback.
Wanted to ask the community first though, what are the current must-have features for a solid COD product nowadays?
What matters most to you guys?
Legit settings?
Rage features?
Streamproof?
Controller support?
Spoofer integration?
Unlock tools?
BO7 / Warzone specific features?
Curious what people actually care about most currently before we move further with it.
The market is headed this way anyway. The anti cheats are stronger, the big game devs are banning left right and center, the cheese world is getting tighter so it comes with the territory. Prices will go up.Quote:
Safety is mandatory, everything else is secondary. By the way, I feel you should reconsider the price of your Call of Duty chair; $66 is excessive, $40 or $45 is more reasonable.
you dont need to pay 60 bucks for a cheat for cod, its an obvious rage bait and overprice, you could just stop being a bitch and come back to the cheat you used a month agoQuote:
That's when I stop cheating all together, having to pay 60+ to cheat in one game is diabolical. That's the plus side of AA, you pay a sub and get access to ALL public cheats they provide. DMA should only be purchased if you plan on making that money back while doing tourneys or cmg
I took the one-week free trial they offered a few days ago. The performance is quite good and the aimbot is pretty decent, although the price seems rather excessive. As for security, I don't have much to say since they were released recently, so I'd give them a few months to see if they truly remain undetectable.Quote:
Has anyone even bought elocarry and can give feedback?
Dma quite easy ngl. For other games if you dont use dma just killswitch the card xdQuote:
Not defending elo here, but lets be honest, public cheat scene in cod been a mess for at least two years, exactly after PO going offline, HelioS having real life stuff not able to focus on his cheats, Proofcore being targeted. As far for other providers, all i see is drama and shit talk about detek, not detek, scam etc.. There no realiable public cheat anymore.
Worse, HV went private and thats understandable why, but if elo comes and offers a secure cheat, a care same way zebleer provided for security, then why not, trust me DMA is a headache, yes its amazing when you set it up, but then comes FW issue, not many here just play cod, other play games that has EAC and other intrusive AC's, and even cod might change in near future and implement dma checks if they havent already testing it rn.
But if ELO comes and actually provides security, 60$ is worth it, better than dma headache, price is expensive but take a look at apex, rust, fortnite scene they are all expensive because a DEV wouldnt put all his time to track AC changes if its not worth it, we have been spoiled with cheap pasted cheats in cod scene for years because Ricochet was crap and now they actually improving and now we see the result.
The era of pasted crap is over, if you want go undetected for a long time, either expensive public cheats with good rep, slotted private ones or dma route.
Deal with it, or just go legit lmao
I can recommend Advance; it's a good public CHEESE s and has good security. I would gladly pay for elocarry; it's a very good service. However, paying $66 right now for a cheat that's less than a week old might not be worth it. But if they prove over time that they remain undetectable, then it could definitely be worthwhile.Quote:
Not defending elo here, but lets be honest, public cheat scene in cod been a mess for at least two years, exactly after PO going offline, HelioS having real life stuff not able to focus on his cheats, Proofcore being targeted. As far for other providers, all i see is drama and shit talk about detek, not detek, scam etc.. There no realiable public cheat anymore.
Worse, HV went private and thats understandable why, but if elo comes and offers a secure cheat, a care same way zebleer provided for security, then why not, trust me DMA is a headache, yes its amazing when you set it up, but then comes FW issue, not many here just play cod, other play games that has EAC and other intrusive AC's, and even cod might change in near future and implement dma checks if they havent already testing it rn.
But if ELO comes and actually provides security, 60$ is worth it, better than dma headache, price is expensive but take a look at apex, rust, fortnite scene they are all expensive because a DEV wouldnt put all his time to track AC changes if its not worth it, we have been spoiled with cheap pasted cheats in cod scene for years because Ricochet was crap and now they actually improving and now we see the result.
The era of pasted crap is over, if you want go undetected for a long time, either expensive public cheats with good rep, slotted private ones or dma route.
Deal with it, or just go legit lmao