The part about HWID flagged sounds so good, actually i love it if that is true.Quote:
I’ve read elsewhere that high trust games are “easier” to get a cooldown in, and they are likely using low trust games to gather more data. It would make sense because my friend has red trust (gives me 2 red warnings when I play with him) gets into rage lobbies almost every time.
I was speaking to one of the cheaters in the game and he said he was using trigger instead of aim, but other than that they were hoppin around the whole game, blasting through walls and smoke etc.
My friend got a cooldown on his cheater account shortly after this update rolled out, and it almost seems like his HWID is now flagged for red trust. Every single account he logs into now has red trust, even the brand new one he bought off the steam store himself, and he’s never even injected on any of these other accounts.
unlucky, new accounts? Red TF Lobby?:elegiggle:Quote:
cap, had 3 games yesterday with full ragers lol
its fear mongering. the cheat scene has this idea that kernel or dma is needed for 100% safety, and every cheat has mass-pushed it so they get more sales. Now, everyone thinks um is unsafeQuote:
To reiterate.
DMA, external, internal.
This has nothing to do with VACLive.
VACLive is just VACNet, the same server-side AI anti-cheat they've been training for years.
This literally has nothing to do with their AC client, or how the actual cheat operates.
If you have the same aimbot and activity on DMA and an internal, you would be banned if the other is banned.
It's all based on data and analytics, focused to detect the actual features instead of the cheat software itself. This is similar to what Rust and Apex do on their serverside.
Also, side note.
Why are people buying DMA / DMA cheats for Counter-Strike?
You don't even need kernel access to bypass VAC
No bro you need hypervisor cheat to bypass VAC *sarcasm off*.. Bypassing VAC out of usermode for 13 years now and people still fall for kernel cheat meme... I bet they wont even update VAC (clientside ac) anymore..Quote:
To reiterate.
DMA, external, internal.
This has nothing to do with VACLive.
VACLive is just VACNet, the same server-side AI anti-cheat they've been training for years.
This literally has nothing to do with their AC client, or how the actual cheat operates.
If you have the same aimbot and activity on DMA and an internal, you would be banned if the other is banned.
It's all based on data and analytics, focused to detect the actual features instead of the cheat software itself. This is similar to what Rust and Apex do on their serverside.
Also, side note.
Why are people buying DMA / DMA cheats for Counter-Strike?
You don't even need kernel access to bypass VAC