Any 2pc colorbots?

Quote:

Originally Posted by .MOON. Bruh, it's aiming at shoulders XD

Quote:

Originally Posted by CipherCircuit Yeah I’m having trouble finding the correct colour but then I just found out today it’s easier to do pixel calibration/Calculation for most pixel density then cold code a X and Y offset so it reads shoulder but calibration moves it to head or neck. Also 2pc still needs a bypass for input my friend. I’m also tryna make it radiant safe so no generic capture methods like reading from buffer or plugins. They just flag you along with arp. I’m just solely Relying on my emulation at this point. Everything and anything else is just another vector of detection. Im tryna make something new so I took the extra steps because why not you know

Quote:

Originally Posted by DefNot_Toxic Thats looks like really bad bro, sorry to say

Quote:

Originally Posted by .MOON. Good luck on the calibration stuff. it's not really a bypass because you aren't bypassing anything, your just using an HID device. There are plenty of HID devices that are safe and aren't flagged. You can also just use a capture card but NDI is safe. But using a capture card or NDI isn't a detection vector when people use these to record gameplay and stream gameplay to things like twitch.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CipherCircuit i don't know if you have some type of neurological disorder that prevents you from reading so try use text to speech or something to assist yourself. MOON is naturally brain dead so i don't expect anything else from him but other people doing the same thing, shame! Like imagine talking shit about someone's project that isn't even finished: confused: some changes i made today after my revision. This time i recorded the actual game and not display render so you fish brains can understand whats hapenning updated video with Aimbot fov 200 [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] True that's why 2pc is easier to run, lol. You right though. That's why i went for the capture card method and not a buffer or whatever read. In saying that i use the same emulation for 1PC and 2PC. I already manage AI so it's nothing new to me in terms of capturing vectors. Pixelbots though, another story. I find it harder reading the pixels so just another vector there Isn't just a simple HID. I went for a 1:1. The HID i run does exploit the razer driver but it's not the generic one you prob seen around the forums for HID injections. it's just abusing the functions for strings like 0xFF9 or something for emulation reasonings. I don't know if that makes sense without full context but I'm sure you understand

Quote:

Originally Posted by .MOON. I can feel the latency through the video lol. It's funny that you say I am brain dead but all my stuff is snappy and not laggy but to each their own i guess. I wonder what their server side sees with all that non human shaking on the target. hmmmmmmmm.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CipherCircuit Yeah I don’t know if you also have a brain, everything is maxed out. Wasn’t made to be maxed out especially when it’s a Colorbot. Benchmark is 100ishMS so there isn’t a latency as you think you see. That’s you just making stuff up bozo. If you care so much and wanna keep denying my build is better I’ll be more then happy to send another video with normal speeds�� Buttttt maybe the “latency” you see is from frame skipping as I was holding flick bot. Hints why it moves back to frame/crosshair.

Quote:

Originally Posted by .MOON. Looks terrible and 100ms is garbage. Come back once you have 10ms reaction on human benchmark XD. But yeah, let's see the normal not maxed out speeds XD. Why don't you make a static bot, lock on, then strafe left and right and let's see how well it tracks! :) Here is a real video with 200 fov: [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] Just look at your video. You can literally see the input lag. It’s ghosty, it’s clunky, it’s like dragging a rock through molasses. Now, compare that to mine. Crisp. Instant. You feel the lower latency. It’s not even close.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CipherCircuit Maybe I’m being egotistical I’ll do a general discussion post and see what people think

Quote:

Originally Posted by .MOON. Yeah, I think you are. You seriously underestimate my ability to create a high-quality product... both of which are clearly on display here. Let’s be real, you’re embarrassed after comparing both videos, and now you suddenly want a separate post so no one can see just how much better mine is than yours.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CipherCircuit To be honest, I think I’d have more respect towards you if you actually developed your own products. You just use hardware that another 500 People use. You can’t use the same hardware and expect good creditably. Only thing I know you made is the actual software like aim and whatnot but at that point can’t even confirm without reading source. I have a faceit build and currently 8 builds for valorant. So in my eyes I’m just better tehe. You clearly better making aimbots as I’m inexperienced in that sector(colorbots). Although that doesn’t matter when you can write a good bypass. If you are interested I actually wouldn’t mind working together. Who knows maybe you could improve my current builds for aim equations. I have to admit the mathematics are good in your source. I actually failed math and again. My sources are good but they could always be better in terms of linear equations. Who knows, one day when they patch that build what you gonna do then ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by .MOON. I literally develop my own products. Your argument is fundamentally flawed. Everyone in this space uses common hardware platforms like Arduino, Teensy, and ESP32. It’s about implementation, not just hardware. A bad implementation is bad. A good implementation is good. Simple as that.

Quote:

I’m not about to waste money reinventing the wheel when perfectly viable hardware already exists. What actually matters is the software, the optimization, and the execution.

Quote:

And let’s get one thing straight. You can’t patch a build. That’s not how this works. As long as usable HID devices exist, Moonlight will keep running. Makcu, Ferrum, XenMouse, NeoMouse, Moonlink, and plenty more all work just fine.

Quote:

Oh, and let’s talk AI. My object detection runs at sub 5ms inference. Some models hit sub 1ms. And I’m not stopping there. I’m adding pose detection too, so yeah, full skeleton bone aiming.

Quote:

This isn’t just about bypassing. It’s about engineering a superior product.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CipherCircuit True but then you said “ This isn’t just about bypassing. It’s about engineering a superior product.” I don’t believe anyone is engineering anything when they use public hardware methods. That’s a copy and paste build. Engineering is making something from scratch and innovation skills. Not true. They can patch, hardware limitations are a thing. , MCs like ards. Every hardware component has limitations and there comes a point when a Component reaches the end of its life. They may run fine but again you are using Components another 500 people use and Distribute. Quality over quantity. Not very safe for customers. Even if it’s a “stable” HID. Is that HID gonna pass a manual Inspection? Most definitely not. If that were so superior and everything you saying then go try implement the same thing on a higher level Provider such as FACEIT. FACEIT is superior. FACEIT requires innovation and engineering. VGK is extremely easy to bypass for HIDS. FACEIT requires full rebuild of protocol communication methods such as SPI. Unlike valorant, you just make a simple HID and you good to go. Yeah, AI is different of course. As I stated. I’m new to Colorbot so methods of screen grabbing and etc aren’t Optimised as much as others as I’m inexperienced. My AI benchmarks are roughly the same. My GPU benchmark on a 1080 runs at the same intervals per neural network calculation and overall run time. Roughly 5-15ms Using others people’s hardware isn’t engineering and being superior. It’s called being lazy. When I built my FACEIT cheat. I spent roughly $2300aud alone just on hardware and testing random shit. That’s engineering. Not using others people hardware and calling yourself innovative and telling people you sell a superior product. That’s silly. Point is you have never developed anything outside of valorant and it shows because you actually believe a HID input is advanced and superior. Believing moonlink and whatever is safe is extremely silly. . You are at base 1 of HID communications. Go learn some protocols and you’ll understand the fundamentals of what actual innovation & engineering is. Using. Bytes,Bits low level circuitry and languages is completely different to just a HID. Most people on these forums probably don’t even know the difference and the people who do know don’t talk about it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by .MOON. It’s crazy how confidently you talk about this while missing the bigger picture. Engineering isn’t about throwing money at hardware just to say you ‘built’ something... it’s about smart design, optimization, and actually executing ideas that work. If you think spending $$$ on custom hardware makes you innovative, do you, but real engineering is about results, not just how much you spent. This idea that using common hardware means there's no innovation is crazy. By that logic, anyone writing code in python or cpp isn’t innovating because they didn’t create the language themselves. It's how you use the tools!

Quote:

Originally Posted by CipherCircuit What is the definition of innovation my friend. No one said anything about languages and that’s silly to bring programming languages into this. I’ll help you out though, innovation is creating something new. You aren’t doing that. End of the day all I gotta say is go make a 1PC build. You can’t though because you only know what’s publicly used and known. You keep innovating with the publicly known hardware. Should be respectful towards customers though because most people here won’t know the difference between good and goood