Quote:
Originally Posted by RoflLmaoNo
His point is that perhaps people shouldn't consider your product while it is literally still in testing.
Trying to garner sales during said testing period, wherein you have zero guarantee that your update is undetected due to the limited amount of time that has passed since, is scummy.
You yourself have mentioned that the prior bans were delayed - it hasn't even been a week since you updated your framework; so going by the delay period, your product update has not been sufficiently tested to even be considered as undetected at this stage. You'll continue peddling self-recommendations in enquiry threads anyway - but it's wank behaviour.
|
We always spent 2-4 days for testing, for both internal (which is closed long time ago now, but experience still works) and external version (external version got detected once in August, fix took longer tho, but there were no delay bans that took 2-3 whole days), so did we this time as well. Since before it worked out just fine, we did the same now, so nothing scummy, just using experience from the past. Testers played normally for whole 2 and some of them 3 days. Considering that and projects that being hosted reporting 0 bans, the decision was right.
What comes to sales, I've put product on hold as soon as I got reports again after 3 days of successful testing. So yeah, def nothing scummy, just experience from the past. Besides that, we have some other products that keep sales going, so there is no reason to even think about doing something scummy.