Making sure main is safe

Quote:

Originally Posted by SauceMachine doesn't matter, as long as the account itself hasn't been banned. If you do get banned, the HWID ban will only apply to your the current hwid, not all previous ones.

Oh so, I already have an alt account, that I played on full legit as I haven't ever cheated on COD yet, obviously never used spoofer either. If I start cheating on this alt account while being spoofed, if it eventually gets banned, I should be fine on my main then? Are you 100% about this? Can't afford to lose my main.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BUURNITDOWN Oh so, I already have an alt account, that I played on full legit as I haven't ever cheated on COD yet, obviously never used spoofer either. If I start cheating on this alt account while being spoofed, if it eventually gets banned, I should be fine on my main then? Are you 100% about this? Can't afford to lose my main.

Yes, if spoofed your main should stay safe.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuspectServices Yes, if spoofed your main should stay safe.

Alright, now idk which cheat to go for, for ease of use and customization, easy to config, and giving a good advantage while playing legit, not looking to rage at all.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BUURNITDOWN Alright, now idk which cheat to go for, for ease of use and customization, easy to config, and giving a good advantage while playing legit, not looking to rage at all.

Refer to @[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] list and choose according to your needs. All of the providers on there are safe for now. Anything can happen, especially with S02 nearing and their bold claims for S03. If you want to be absolutely sure, stay legit until a week or so after S02. We may all be surprised.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Outsider Refer to @[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] list and choose according to your needs. All of the providers on there are safe for now. Anything can happen, especially with S02 nearing and their bold claims for S03. If you want to be absolutely sure, stay legit until a week or so after S02. We may all be surprised.

Alright, will do that, otherwise I don't know, I was eyeing AA but their forum is a turn off for me, I like a more modern and clear community / support.
Also been looking at SyntheticSkill and ProofCore but won't go with PC due to ID..

Quote:

Originally Posted by BUURNITDOWN Alright, will do that, otherwise I don't know, I was eyeing AA but their forum is a turn off for me, I like a more modern and clear community / support. Also been looking at SyntheticSkill and ProofCore but won't go with PC due to ID..

Don’t let the old school vbulletin look kill you. AA is a great product and a good staff.

SyntheticSkill is a tremendous product.
ProofCore is worth it and their ID Verification isn’t as intrusive as you may think.

SyntheticSkill has controller support…if that kind of thing blows your skirt up.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Outsider Don’t let the old school vbulletin look kill you. AA is a great product and a good staff. SyntheticSkill is a tremendous product. ProofCore is worth it and their ID Verification isn’t as intrusive as you may think. SyntheticSkill has controller support…if that kind of thing blows your skirt up.

Would you be able to rank these 3 for the one that's simple to use / config while still giving a nice and definite competitive advantage?

Quote:

Originally Posted by BUURNITDOWN Would you be able to rank these 3 for the one that's simple to use / config while still giving a nice and definite competitive advantage?

Ease of use?

Straight out of the box, without reading any guides:
Synthetic
ProofCore
AA

If you take the time to read the guides, ProofCore can be much easier to humanize their settings.

However, one like AA has weapon group configs where you can adjust ab settings by what weapon class you’re running. Also, another fantastic part is, you can adjust hitboxes/aimtype by your enemies health. I always found that it helped with humanization when using that. But you have to do your homework and learn the framework. The community is glad to help each other and they share configs along with staff having topics stickied everywhere that explains the framework in detail.

I suggest picking any of the externals on the list, honestly. Aimex and AimMaster are both good products too. EloCarry is on the newer side, but a fine product as well with a proven track record and fantastic team…plus, a birdie told me they are rolling out some major updates…(not really a birdie, you can track their updates on their website).

Good luck bro. Feel free to ask anymore questions.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Outsider Ease of use? Straight out of the box, without reading any guides: Synthetic ProofCore AA If you take the time to read the guides, ProofCore can be much easier to humanize their settings. However, one like AA has weapon group configs where you can adjust ab settings by what weapon class you’re running. Also, another fantastic part is, you can adjust hitboxes/aimtype by your enemies health. I always found that it helped with humanization when using that. But you have to do your homework and learn the framework. The community is glad to help each other and they share configs along with staff having topics stickied everywhere that explains the framework in detail. I suggest picking any of the externals on the list, honestly. Aimex and AimMaster are both good products too. EloCarry is on the newer side, but a fine product as well with a proven track record and fantastic team…plus, a birdie told me they are rolling out some major updates…(not really a birdie, you can track their updates on their website). Good luck bro. Feel free to ask anymore questions.

Wow thanks so much for the help bro, I do have some more questions if you don't mind.

So, as I said I'm really new to COD cheating, well can't even say I'm new I've just been lurking and gathering infos and stuff, I don't wanna just get into it blindly without knowing anything and I've seen a decent amount of people say that AA is really shady and have a backdoor in their cheat or whatever, and will sometimes hold your pc hostage unless you pay some big amounts of money, any info on that?

Also about EO, I've been looking at them and they seem really attractive, it's the cheapest cheat while being very high quality, has a TG, a big community and stuff, but obviously they are Activision's main target and so I think they are bound to have more detections than other providers, so I don't really know.

Also would you say externals are safer than internals? I see many conflicting opinions on that.

What are the pros and cons of externals vs internals? I think I've always preferred internals, but I'm looking to closet cheat and keep my account hopefully "forever" although I won't use on main.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BUURNITDOWN Wow thanks so much for the help bro, I do have some more questions if you don't mind. So, as I said I'm really new to COD cheating, well can't even say I'm new I've just been lurking and gathering infos and stuff, I don't wanna just get into it blindly without knowing anything and I've seen a decent amount of people say that AA is really shady and have a backdoor in their cheat or whatever, and will sometimes hold your pc hostage unless you pay some big amounts of money, any info on that? Also about EO, I've been looking at them and they seem really attractive, it's the cheapest cheat while being very high quality, has a TG, a big community and stuff, but obviously they are Activision's main target and so I think they are bound to have more detections than other providers, so I don't really know. Also would you say externals are safer than internals? I see many conflicting opinions on that. What are the pros and cons of externals vs internals? I think I've always preferred internals, but I'm looking to closet cheat and keep my account hopefully "forever" although I won't use on main.

What the fuck? Can you point me to where somebody said that? I’ve been apart of AA user base for hell, idk…well over a year? Maybe even working on 2 years? And I’ve never once heard of that lol. It sounds to me like someone just spreading misinformation.

Internal vs external is just an ongoing fight, tbf. A competent internal dev and a competent external dev can both keep their products undetected for a while. Anti-cheat and cheat devs are just at a constant cat and mouse battle. If you want to know the main difference, Google can explain. It’s pretty simple in laymen’s terms, but I personally can’t say which is truly better.

Performance? Internal.
Possibly safer? External.

In the case of safety and really shooting for forever? Go with ProofCore. The only product on the market with longevity and zero detections. SyntheticSkill hasn’t had any detections to date, but has a much more limited lifespan when compared to ProofCore.

@[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] can explain AA’s detection history. I just know they went ~3 years detection free and to me, is the most customizable product on the market.

Lastly, don’t cheat on your main. “Forever” and “safe” cannot be used together in the same sentence because Nobody knows what S02 and S03–or even the future after—will bring. They could’ve easily just been talking shit to blow smoke up peoples ass…or they could be serious and have actually dumped some serious time and money into the AC. Ricochet has potential and Activision has plenty of money to dump into this. The game has been an absolute dumpster fire for a while now. Who really knows what they’ve been cooking up behind the scenes.

I’m not a dev or anyone knowledgeable, really. Just keep that in mind.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Outsider Don’t let the old school vbulletin look kill you. AA is a great product and a good staff. SyntheticSkill is a tremendous product. ProofCore is worth it and their ID Verification isn’t as intrusive as you may think. SyntheticSkill has controller support…if that kind of thing blows your skirt up.

What about ID verification "isn't as intrusive as you may think"? Sending sensitive personal information online is highly intrusive in my view, serving little purpose and offering minimal real impact.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Outsider What the fuck? Can you point me to where somebody said that? I’ve been apart of AA user base for hell, idk…well over a year? Maybe even working on 2 years? And I’ve never once heard of that lol. It sounds to me like someone just spreading misinformation. Internal vs external is just an ongoing fight, tbf. A competent internal dev and a competent external dev can both keep their products undetected for a while. Anti-cheat and cheat devs are just at a constant cat and mouse battle. If you want to know the main difference, Google can explain. It’s pretty simple in laymen’s terms, but I personally can’t say which is truly better. Performance? Internal. Possibly safer? External. In the case of safety and really shooting for forever? Go with ProofCore. The only product on the market with longevity and zero detections. SyntheticSkill hasn’t had any detections to date, but has a much more limited lifespan when compared to ProofCore. @[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] can explain AA’s detection history. I just know they went ~3 years detection free and to me, is the most customizable product on the market. Lastly, don’t cheat on your main. “Forever” and “safe” cannot be used together in the same sentence because Nobody knows what S02 and S03–or even the future after—will bring. They could’ve easily just been talking shit to blow smoke up peoples ass…or they could be serious and have actually dumped some serious time and money into the AC. Ricochet has potential and Activision has plenty of money to dump into this. The game has been an absolute dumpster fire for a while now. Who really knows what they’ve been cooking up behind the scenes. I’m not a dev or anyone knowledgeable, really. Just keep that in mind.

Will not name any providers who went out their way to ruin AA's rep 3 years ago, with their alt accounts, shills, paid actors, anyhow its all good now, but there was an abuse by a particular staff member? Yes and he was banned years ago, but AA got accused non stop because it was largest provider after EO between 2020-2021 in cod wise, so bash and ruin a big providers name and get their customers, rest is history.

Detections were april 2021 then went undetected till march 2024, 3 years. And undetected for almost a year now.

Spoofer undetected since feb. 2022

Feature detection happened in 3 year span which was u lock tool but was [at own risk] use, those who didnt use never got banned.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SauceMachine What about ID verification "isn't as intrusive as you may think"? Sending sensitive personal information online is highly intrusive in my view, serving little purpose and offering minimal real impact.

I meant the details requested aren’t as bad as I thought. I’m not saying I agree with it or not, but I trust them…just as I do every other provider who may or may not handle personal information. If one is willing to give an identification for the idea they are better protected, then so be it.

Edit:

Here is a quote from @[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Quote:

While it does seem like quite a leap of faith to hand over your ID to a stranger online, I want to stress to you that what I ask to see is very minimal, but it's enough to determine whether I'll accept somebody into the community or not and it can be permanently deleted as soon as your application has been processed. I would never ask for your ID's unique numbers, QR codes, home address and anything else like that. Think about it this way, if you buy a DMA device from a marketplace (and many people have), the seller would need a name and address to ship it to, but proofcore would never know where you live because you can cover that part up

Whether one is okay with this or trusts that, is entirely up to the individual.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Outsider I meant the details requested aren’t as bad as I thought. I’m not saying I agree with it or not, but I trust them…just as I do every other provider who may or may not handle personal information. If one is willing to give an identification for the idea they are better protected, then so be it. Edit: Here is a quote from @[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] Whether one is okay with this or trusts that, is entirely up to the individual.

I understand, i was under the impression that we were talking about a full scan of the passport or something similar. Thanks for clearing that up. That being said i still don't really see any value in it in general, but thats a different story.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Outsider What the fuck? Can you point me to where somebody said that? I’ve been apart of AA user base for hell, idk…well over a year? Maybe even working on 2 years? And I’ve never once heard of that lol. It sounds to me like someone just spreading misinformation. Internal vs external is just an ongoing fight, tbf. A competent internal dev and a competent external dev can both keep their products undetected for a while. Anti-cheat and cheat devs are just at a constant cat and mouse battle. If you want to know the main difference, Google can explain. It’s pretty simple in laymen’s terms, but I personally can’t say which is truly better. Performance? Internal. Possibly safer? External. In the case of safety and really shooting for forever? Go with ProofCore. The only product on the market with longevity and zero detections. SyntheticSkill hasn’t had any detections to date, but has a much more limited lifespan when compared to ProofCore. @[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] can explain AA’s detection history. I just know they went ~3 years detection free and to me, is the most customizable product on the market. Lastly, don’t cheat on your main. “Forever” and “safe” cannot be used together in the same sentence because Nobody knows what S02 and S03–or even the future after—will bring. They could’ve easily just been talking shit to blow smoke up peoples ass…or they could be serious and have actually dumped some serious time and money into the AC. Ricochet has potential and Activision has plenty of money to dump into this. The game has been an absolute dumpster fire for a while now. Who really knows what they’ve been cooking up behind the scenes. I’m not a dev or anyone knowledgeable, really. Just keep that in mind.

Hey bro, I couldn't pinpoint you to a specific post right now cause I would need to look up a lot of stuff, I spent hours and hours looking up cheats and comparing them, spoofers etc so I don't exactly remember which posts I found those claims on but some were on epvp, some on reddit and some might have been on unknown cheats. But epvp and reddit for sure.
It might be misinformation, as far as I can tell, it seems HelioS is reputable.

A cheat being external doesn't make it safer by default? Then I guess I would for sure go for internal, because that's what I prefer. I tried both external and internal on csgo and preferred internal by FAR.

I'm really tempted to go with SS tho at the same time, I think I wouldn't care about the cheat being external if it meant being safer, but today I have actually been eyeing EO, but that's probably a bad idea when it comes to long term cheating, as I understand they are Activision's main target.

Yeah I won't cheat on my main, just on an alt, but I was wondering with the spoofing thing, I heard it can mess up windows and even worse. I've also seen that as long as I go with a reputable provider all should be good, I think my number 1 is reported.lol but it is kinda pricey.. Also, I've seen some people complain that they have the "Activate Windows" message pop up after spoofing, what's up with that?

Thanks again man