I NEED CS2 PRIVATE CHEAT

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebleer There is no legitimate reason to sell a CS2 cheat with any restrictions. Doing so tells me that the seller is trying to cash in on the skeet marketing scheme or they think that they can sell a very insecure product "invite only" to keep it UD (which is false) Customers in the CS2 market absolutely should be going with public security focused providers who have a good record on not only CS but other games with stronger anti-cheats, specifically ones with a driver component

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebleer There is no legitimate reason to sell a CS2 cheat with any restrictions. Doing so tells me that the seller is trying to cash in on the skeet marketing scheme or they think that they can sell a very insecure product "invite only" to keep it UD (which is false) Customers in the CS2 market absolutely should be going with public security focused providers who have a good record on not only CS but other games with stronger anti-cheats, specifically ones with a driver component

Quote:

Originally Posted by doctordope You're making yourself sound really stupid and desperate.

Quote:

Originally Posted by doctordope Stop spamming the forums and spewing FUD to glorify your cheat.

Quote:

Originally Posted by doctordope There are a handful of legitimate private providers who you probably don't even know about which I guarantee their security is much gap proof than PO ever will be.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aewbin I even told you some legitimate reasons and there are even more :D That doesnt make any sense, I already told you. Just stop trying to make other providers look bad with your passive-aggressive postings. In the end you are the one which looks bad.

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebleer Warning people about the widespread CS "invite only"/"private" provider schemes while recommending not only myself but also a list of my competitors is not stupid or desperate. IDC if people buy my cheat or IW or EO or another public security focused provider. The idea is to help them not fall for the skeet schemes Just because I've posted my opinion on the same matter in a few unique messages doesn't make it spam Also ah yes, the golden rule of pushing any scheme: say anyone who calls it out is just "spreading or spewing FUD" Again, I'm not glorifying my cheat. I'm saying that people should pick a security focused public provider with a good record. I am far from the only provider on that list & I show open respect to my competitors who deserve it Always a good sign when you can't name examples. If these un-named providers have better security than a public provider who has never been detected on CS and likely never will be, why are they selling privately? I also find it interesting that you think you know anything about my security. When I speak about Oxide's security, it's because I actually bought their cheat and reversed it. That gives me the ability to speak on what I found. You just deciding to comment on my security because you don't like what I say is very different If calling out the bullshit you & others continue to push into the market makes me look bad, then I'll look bad You sell an insecure paste. You can't even figure out how to select the correct process to attach to without detection vectors. To work in fullscreen you use a paste that has been repasted on UC more times than you probably are years old. Every cool feature you have is a barely modified paste. The list goes on But to compensate for all of this, instead of being a public insecure product like you should be, you opted to copy skeet & go "invite only" which your customers believe makes them safe. The problem is that it doesn't & you are just using a marketing scheme to grow your name. Of course you allowed invites so freely that they began getting sold because you didn't even bother to setup a secure system. It was never about security anyways, only marketing. When you want to boost things even further, you use bots/customers to spam YouTube & other places online to get your narrative set in motion. Even kero changed his mind about Oxide because of your bots. But I see right through it If someone had a really unique/secure product with good methods & chose to for whatever reason sell privately, that's fine with me. However with how the CS market is right now, those providers are buried under skeet schemes. Everyone "private" or "invite only" wants us to believe that they are the real deal & not a scheme, but most of them are. Therefore public security focused providers with a good record against VAC and better anti-cheats are the way to go

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebleer Warning people about the widespread CS "invite only"/"private" provider schemes while recommending not only myself but also a list of my competitors is not stupid or desperate. IDC if people buy my cheat or IW or EO or another public security focused provider. The idea is to help them not fall for the skeet schemes Just because I've posted my opinion on the same matter in a few unique messages doesn't make it spam Also ah yes, the golden rule of pushing any scheme: say anyone who calls it out is just "spreading or spewing FUD" Again, I'm not glorifying my cheat. I'm saying that people should pick a security focused public provider with a good record. I am far from the only provider on that list & I show open respect to my competitors who deserve it Always a good sign when you can't name examples. If these un-named providers have better security than a public provider who has never been detected on CS and likely never will be, why are they selling privately? I also find it interesting that you think you know anything about my security. When I speak about Oxide's security, it's because I actually bought their cheat and reversed it. That gives me the ability to speak on what I found. You just deciding to comment on my security because you don't like what I say is very different If calling out the bullshit you & others continue to push into the market makes me look bad, then I'll look bad You sell an insecure paste. You can't even figure out how to select the correct process to attach to without detection vectors. To work in fullscreen you use a paste that has been repasted on UC more times than you probably are years old. Every cool feature you have is a barely modified paste. The list goes on But to compensate for all of this, instead of being a public insecure product like you should be, you opted to copy skeet & go "invite only" which your customers believe makes them safe. The problem is that it doesn't & you are just using a marketing scheme to grow your name. Of course you allowed invites so freely that they began getting sold because you didn't even bother to setup a secure system. It was never about security anyways, only marketing. When you want to boost things even further, you use bots/customers to spam YouTube & other places online to get your narrative set in motion. Even kero changed his mind about Oxide because of your bots. But I see right through it If someone had a really unique/secure product with good methods & chose to for whatever reason sell privately, that's fine with me. However with how the CS market is right now, those providers are buried under skeet schemes. Everyone "private" or "invite only" wants us to believe that they are the real deal & not a scheme, but most of them are. Therefore public security focused providers with a good record against VAC and better anti-cheats are the way to go

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aewbin At the moment you called my product paste I stoped reading your bs. Seems like you have zero clue who I am.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 173618 How is Flo pasting when he was legit one of the first providers to release a finished product when cs2 came out? Back than people on uc where still figuring out how to read the player pawns, so your statement makes absolutely no sense. Please quit spreading bullshit.

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebleer You were a skid admin for unityhacks the provider that exit scammed after being unable to avoid VACs. Then either with or without phil you helped make Oxide using the skeet scheme so you would be able to trick people into thinking you offered anything resembling a secure product. I don't know what paster you are working with for Oxide but I am fully aware you are not a developer either way I do not use the term paster without knowing for sure. Your rendering method is pasted. Much of your security is lazy. The way you select the game process is retarded. Some of your features are barely modified pastes. The barely protected static path config saving on disk is a meme that I hardly even see on free cheat releases How would you even be able to deny these accusations? You've probably never even seen the code for Oxide

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebleer Nice first post ever on EPVP. Next time Flo asks you to come defend him in an EPVP argument, tell him to defend himself. You already bought his product & don't owe him anything more As for your comment, I never said Flo was pasting. Flo isn't a developer at all. However the developer he works with does paste quite a bit. I didn't say he couldn't port his CSGO cheat over to CS2 without pasting. I said he pasted his bypass mainly and some extra features. That's what matters to me. He's clearly fine to create & update the cheat but when the rendering, process selection, & some features are pasted & the config saving and security is terrible, the cheat should be sold as a public meme cheat for dirt cheap, not carried around as a security focused "invite only" "exclusive" product when it's less safe than every public security focused product

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aewbin At the moment you called my product paste I stoped reading your bs. Seems like you have zero clue who I am.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aewbin At this point I have to correct my statement, you have even less than 0 clue. Now I understand why no one takes you serious. Whatever, I wont reply anymore to your posts. Just leave my business as it is and stop trashtalking.

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebleer I also find it interesting that you think you know anything about my security. When I speak about Oxide's security, it's because I actually bought their cheat and reversed it. That gives me the ability to speak on what I found. You just deciding to comment on my security because you don't like what I say is very different

Quote:

Originally Posted by bluewhale22 You have any proof of the stuff you claim? Because claims of having pasted security and other aspects is a serious claim without proof. If I were to say I reversed your cheat and that the security came straight from UC, but without proof, you'd be undoubtedly mad that I'm spewing bullshit - hope you understand where I'm coming from.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless This is a thread to help people not for people to argue.