INTERNAL CHEATS

EngineOwning is actually pretty good right now for CS2. It has aimbot and autowall which will easily let you beat any closet external cheaters.

One step above that I would say is Aimware. You’re basically untouchable in Premier/Competitive right now if you semi-rage, but of course they have a huge track record of detections.

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebleer The NoHyper thing seemed fake/like sabotage to me. I wasn't referring to that. I was referring to the RTF spam in the ini shoutbox followed by them removing shout entirely, then VAC reports elsewhere that got cleaned up & they denied there was a detection To me there seems to have been a detection that was fixed almost immediately. My only issue is them not recording it/admitting it They fixed it fast and not everyone got hit so I think they are still a good provider for CS2. I was just saying they aren't the "best"

Huh, was not aware of that. If it is true - the detection & their censorship of it happening - then I'm not too sure I'd trust it anymore.

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebleer Yes I have since confirmed it was real. They got detected & covered it up. I know they fixed the detection almost right away but it's still a detection. Them lying about it heavily changed my view of them as well. I spoke respectfully about them before IW or EO for best CS2 internal The NoHyper thing seemed fake/like sabotage to me. I wasn't referring to that. I was referring to the RTF spam in the ini shoutbox followed by them removing shout entirely, then VAC reports elsewhere that got cleaned up & they denied there was a detection To me there seems to have been a detection that was fixed almost immediately. My only issue is them not recording it/admitting it They fixed it fast and not everyone got hit so I think they are still a good provider for CS2. I was just saying they aren't the "best"

Where is the proof of detection? I have seen other people use their cheat the same time that NoHyper got banned and they aren’t banned? Was it a feature detection? And what feature was it?

interwebz for internal for sure.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 Where is the proof of detection? I have seen other people use their cheat the same time that NoHyper got banned and they aren’t banned? Was it a feature detection? And what feature was it?

I think it was a feature detection honestly but not entirely sure what feature, it was a great coverup but not for their customers... honesty is key in this community. They came out with a "quick fix" update minutes after NoHyper was claiming detection. NoHyper got on another account after "quick fix" with the same config and wasn't banned.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dak interwebz for internal for sure. I think it was a feature detection honestly but not entirely sure what feature, it was a great coverup but not for their customers... honesty is key in this community. They came out with a "quick fix" update minutes after NoHyper was claiming detection. NoHyper got on another account after "quick fix" with the same config and wasn't banned.

But where is the proof of the feature detection? It seems kinda weird that they could make a hotfix for a feature in minutes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 But where is the proof of the feature detection? It seems kinda weird that they could make a hotfix for a feature in minutes.

that's what a cover up is, seems weird but possible.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dak that's what a cover up is, seems weird but possible.

Well it is possible NoHyper got manually banned or he got banned from using one of the other 3 cheats on that account, before using iniuria.

I don’t think it’s fair to say they detected when there is no proof of it, also since other people using it didn’t and they would have made a hotfix i litually 5min from him being banned.

Iniuria also doesn’t have the rep to make coverups?

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 Well it is possible NoHyper got manually banned or he got banned from using one of the other 3 cheats on that account, before using iniuria. I don’t think it’s fair to say they detected when there is no proof of it, also since other people using it didn’t and they would have made a hotfix i litually 5min from him being banned. Iniuria also doesn’t have the rep to make coverups?

nah he literally did multiple accounts and blurred out his name etc. still was banned so wasn't a manual, update came out on INI and boom no longer banned... very weird. He also injected the other cheats after to make sure... it was on INI side of things for sure. Again I am not 100% but I find it weird that's all.

Wdym? He wasn’t banned on his accounts after he blurred out the information? What clip have you watched?

The accounts he got banned on wasn’t blurred at the time of the bans. It was litually poor testing as he only tested on a new account right after the first Ban wirh Blur for a few minutters and it wasn’t banned. Then he took of the bluur and was banned again.

It is wierd that iniuria had an update, but again it was poor testing, and even Tabz jumped on with iniuria before it got updated on one if his accounts, and wasn’t banned.

But again he used multiple cheat (including free ones) semi raging and got banned when switching to iniuria after some time playing. How do we know he haven’t used the same cheats on the other accounts he tested? It was all accounts he had laying around and the second one even had a grief ban.

It think it’s unfair to state something without proper proof and testing, and make a conclusion from the information we have, unless someone else have more information to the subject.

I would like to see the clear evidense that Zebleer claims to have on the subject. :pimp:

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 Wdym? He wasn’t banned on his accounts after he blurred out the information? What clip have you watched? The accounts he got banned on wasn’t blurred at the time of the bans. It was litually poor testing as he only tested on a new account right after the first Ban wirh Blur for a few minutters and it wasn’t banned. Then he took of the bluur and was banned again. It is wierd that iniuria had an update, but again it was poor testing, and even Tabz jumped on with iniuria before it got updated on one if his accounts, and wasn’t banned. But again he used multiple cheat (including free ones) semi raging and got banned when switching to iniuria after some time playing. How do we know he haven’t used the same cheats on the other accounts he tested? It was all accounts he had laying around and the second one even had a grief ban. It think it’s unfair to state something without proper proof and testing, and make a conclusion from the information we have, unless someone else have more information to the subject. I would like to see the clear evidense that Zebleer claims to have on the subject. :pimp:

you read my message wrong, he blurred out everything on stream and STILL WAS BANNED using ini, 3+ accounts with the same config so that's why I hint to a feature detection. It was very strange the moment the ini update came out and he went on a new account... he wasn't banned using the same config.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dak you read my message wrong, he blurred out everything on stream and STILL WAS BANNED using ini, 3+ accounts with the same config so that's why I hint to a feature detection. It was very strange the moment the ini update came out and he went on a new account... he wasn't banned using the same config.

He wasn’t banned on any account when he was blurring, i just skimmed through the vid, so what timestamps are you referring to?

He was only banned on 2 accounts too, and as i said before it was poorly tested since it was an account that was already grief banned and it got banned when he removed the blurr.

Yes ini got updated and then he blurred everything out from the start on another account and wasn’t banned.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 He wasn’t banned on any account when he was blurring, i just skimmed through the vid, so what timestamps are you referring to? He was only banned on 2 accounts too, and as i said before it was poorly tested since it was an account that was already grief banned and it got banned when he removed the blurr. Yes ini got updated and then he blurred everything out from the start on another account and wasn’t banned.

like I said I just find it weird man that's all. I'm not here to argue or anything, I see both sides.

have a great day! :pimp:

Quote:

Originally Posted by dak like I said I just find it weird man that's all. I'm not here to argue or anything, I see both sides. have a great day! :pimp:

I don’t wanna argue either, but spreading misinformation and calling out a provider with no proof isn’t cool. :pimp:

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 I don’t wanna argue either, but spreading misinformation and calling out a provider with no proof isn’t cool. :pimp:

it's a coverup so there won't be proof, that's the thing. That's why I'm like idk.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dak it's a coverup so there won't be proof, that's the thing. That's why I'm like idk.

Then you should have said that instead of spreading misinformation about the proof.

It’s fair if you think it’s a coverup and you explain why you think that, but spreading misinformation isn’t cool. :pimp: