Clutch vs Atomic DMA

I've been meaning to write a detailed review of both Clutch and Atomic comparing them, but I haven't gotten around to it. If you are willing to parse through them, here are my detailed notes about things one has or does better that the other does not:

Things Clutch does better

• Tracks items needed for daily/weekly quests
• Has a feature to hide aimlines unless aiming at you
• Has a blacklist to remove items with bad price data (or just any items you don't want to see)
• Better performance
• (Partial) HiDPI/Windows desktop scaling support
• Fully customizeable text info blocks
• Kill feed includes AI and when players extract
• Ability to track hits (show on radar and play optional hitmarker sound)
• No gravity feature (not sure if this is still working though, I think a recent server-side patch limited it)
• Infinite stamina implementation is better (can never run out)
• Color-coded counter shows current # of PMCs, player scavs, scavs, and bosses in-raid
• Shows actual accurate bounding box/geometry of mine and sniper areas pulled from memory (Atomic just has approximate icons)

Things Atomic does better

• Players table (show all players in a table with their stats)
• Loot list (show all loot in the raid, with most valuable loot on top)
• Built-in / default loot filters
• Ability to automatically "mark" suspicious players (high KD)
• Will show which players are sherpas, devs, etc. in the player's table
• Aimbot (although it's not that good)
• ESP automatically matches aspect ratio and FOV of game
• Quest item pick-ups are visible in ESP, not just on map
• Visible-only chams option
• Better vis-check chams (gear included)
• Write functions are not extra $$
• Loot through walls has a helper on the ESP showing you the distance

Honestly, since Clutch recently added a quest tracking system, they are really close and I don't think you can go wrong with either. There are a few things Clutch does better, and a few things Atomic does better.

One thing to note is that any "memory write" features like no recoil, infinite stamina, etc. are an extra subscription for Clutch ("Clutchbox"), whereas they are included on Atomic.

At the moment I still prefer Atomic, but I think they are close enough that if I switched back to Clutch and got used to it again, I think I would probably stick with Clutch.

Both devs are responsive and they both have some bugs. I would say Atomic is slightly buggier than Clutch right now.

Thanks great review you currently have atomic? I love the esp on screen that comes with atomic. That is enough for me to get them instead I think…

Quote:

Originally Posted by Another1ne Thanks great review you currently have atomic? I love the esp on screen that comes with atomic. That is enough for me to get them instead I think…

Yes, I currently use Atomic.

Recommend atomic rather than cs
The first part is customer serivice. I believe cs is not that responsible to users now. some exampes: customer may need to wait for a long time after open a ticket; It took them few months to try to fix lag-switch.
Second part is aimbot.

I have used both and purchased the permanent lagswitch from cs;
But in the end I decide to purchase Atomic for lifetime.
Very good team and harmonious community

I have talked to both atomic and lone now… I’m for sure going to try both. Lones response time and conversation alone is going to get some of my business. Not sure what one will be the winner but we shall see!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Another1ne I have talked to both atomic and lone now… I’m for sure going to try both. Lones response time and conversation alone is going to get some of my business. Not sure what one will be the winner but we shall see!!

Lone has superior aimbot compared to atomic but it loses in everything else sadly

Quote:

Originally Posted by Han Daewi Lone has superior aimbot compared to atomic but it loses in everything else sadly

Lone is also cheaper, what do you notice different with esp radar that makes atomic stand apart?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Another1ne Lone is also cheaper, what do you notice different with esp radar that makes atomic stand apart?

in my opinion better overall radar , 3d esp

Quote:

Originally Posted by Han Daewi in my opinion better overall radar , 3d esp

Hmm I would dispute "better" and say "different" instead ;) I don't mind the criticism though, as we are two highly different products, and might not be for everyone.

Mine is geared more towards passive-radar use -- with some core Write Features sprinkled in. Ironically our Aimbot is a straight up killer -- tagged a guy sprinting on woods the another night at 600+ meters XD.

I won't dispute that Atomic has some really good features, and their write features are definitely more expansive. If it comes down to Clutch vs Atomic I'd recommend them any day.

Thanks for sharing your experience :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Haze4Dayz Was exactly in the same boat as you when I ordered my screamer recently. I ended up going with Atomic and I am very happy with my decision. Very nice team who helped me and answered all my questions. Firmware was easy and took about 30mins and they set everything up via remote assistance. Their radar is exceptional. No lag, very easy to set up, function and use and has all the features you will ever need. Sadly the chams is not streamproof but security is at the highest order.

what are the specs of your pcs?

I want to know who is better in stability and functionality between NF and NEKO, lol