[Release][C++]COEncryption.dll

03/03/2010 22:00 tanelipe#16
I wrote it yesterday after you created this thread, lol. I'm still missing the KeyExchange (KeyExchange meaning the class that wraps all these other classes, same as in the C# implementation) part, mainly because I'm lazy/didn't have interest to finish/do it. Other than it should be working 'perfectly'. All I now need is a proxy :P
03/03/2010 22:24 Nullable#17
Quote:
Originally Posted by tanelipe View Post
I wrote it yesterday after you created this thread, lol. I'm still missing the KeyExchange (KeyExchange meaning the class that wraps all these other classes, same as in the C# implementation) part, mainly because I'm lazy/didn't have interest to finish/do it. Other than it should be working 'perfectly'. All I now need is a proxy :P
Shouldn't take you a lot, it's just a matter of combining everything together, still writing the reply lol(my cryptographic knowledge is sort of limited :p)
03/04/2010 04:24 hunterman01#18
Quote:
Originally Posted by tanelipe View Post
I'm not really into doing it, it's pain in the arse in C# already.
Can you say Agreed to that comment

Im in the process of writing my own source which right now the part im at is writing blowfish.... which blows fish lmao
03/05/2010 14:57 ImmuneOne#19
Quote:
Originally Posted by hunterman01 View Post
Can you say Agreed to that comment

Im in the process of writing my own source which right now the part im at is writing blowfish.... which blows fish lmao
You should use OpenSSL
03/05/2010 15:32 hunterman01#20
Quote:
Originally Posted by ImmuneOne View Post
You should use OpenSSL
Shit i never thought about that would save me alot of time
03/05/2010 17:28 ImmuneOne#21
Quote:
Originally Posted by hunterman01 View Post
Shit i never thought about that would save me alot of time
I presumed you were good enough to code your own wrapper, my mistake.
Anyhow, if you failed to do it included with OpenSSL, then please stop trying.
03/05/2010 21:40 ImFlamedCOD#22
Quote:
Originally Posted by ImmuneOne View Post
You should use OpenSSL
Managed Open SSL also has alot of usless and not used crap in it. So either way it works the same but just saying you do not the full capabilities of opensll wrapper.
03/06/2010 00:16 ImmuneOne#23
Quote:
Originally Posted by ImFlamedCOD View Post
Managed Open SSL also has alot of usless and not used crap in it. So either way it works the same but just saying you do not the full capabilities of opensll wrapper.
That's why coding your own BF Wrapper is the best option.
03/06/2010 01:33 hunterman01#24
Maybe but OpenSLL is the quickest way
03/06/2010 19:57 © Haydz#25
Quote:
Originally Posted by hunterman01 View Post
Maybe but OpenSLL is the quickest way
I personally think importing directly from libeay32 is quicker than using the managed OpenSSL library :p
03/19/2010 14:07 Nullable#26
Updated to Revision 3, fixed bugs in code, tested main encryption class and working 100%
03/19/2010 15:16 tanelipe#27
I have the updated versions of these if you want them. There shouldn't be any errors in this new version. The original version I posted was 'full' of bugs.
03/19/2010 15:29 Nullable#28
Quote:
Originally Posted by tanelipe View Post
I have the updated versions of these if you want them. There shouldn't be any errors in this new version. The original version I posted was 'full' of bugs.
No, but thanks for the offer i am already debugging and i will post updates as i fix up existing bugs :)