NPC Server Oppinions

Quote:

Originally Posted by Korvacs Atually the NPC server would connect in a completely unrelated and seperately threaded manner, so the NPC server should reduce the load quite alot.

In that case, where the load difference is significant, i would have created the npc server

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nullable In that case, where the load difference is significant, i would have created the npc server

Most definitely.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nullable I know that Korvacs does, not sure about you, stating it won't hurt you so don't take it serious -.- Well Korvacs, loading them into the game server would slightly decrease performance, i stated that option because, a server would never use that much cpu that will affect performance dramatically, however if you have the time to create named pipes and split the servers, do it :}

Well, thats because only 1 out of 10 server owners know what a bool is.
And only 1 out of 40 server owners know how to sent a packet.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hepatitis X Well, thats because only 1 out of 10 server owners know what a bool is. And only 1 out of 40 server owners know how to sent a packet.

Wtf are u talking about thts completly off topic?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hepatitis X Well, thats because only 1 out of 10 server owners know what a bool is. And only 1 out of 40 server owners know how to sent a packet. And 3 out of 100 members here know what programming actually is.

.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nullable .

I wouldn't go as low as 3;
(yourself, saint, hybrid, korvacs, zion, sparkie, qonquer (does he count?),myself (tooting my own horn here abit), IAmHawtness, tane).

Starting to struggle reciting them now. Anyhow, not a complete off-topic post.

In all honesty korvacs, I'd trust your own judgment (what a retarded American spelling) on this, your qualified to make justified decisions, and even if it all ends up a disaster, learn and move-on to another solution.

As previously mentioned, pipe server would be the way to go, and you've obviously realised that.

p.s. korvacs - get on msn when possible plz.

Quote:

Originally Posted by © Haydz I wouldn't go as low as 3; (yourself, saint, hybrid, korvacs, zion, sparkie, qonquer (does he count?),myself (tooting my own horn here abit), IAmHawtness, tane). Starting to struggle reciting them now. Anyhow, not a complete off-topic post. In all honesty korvacs, I'd trust your own judgment (what a retarded American spelling) on this, your qualified to make justified decisions, and even if it all ends up a disaster, learn and move-on to another solution. As previously mentioned, pipe server would be the way to go, and you've obviously realised that. p.s. korvacs - get on msn when possible plz.

My mistake, i meant 3 out of each 100 members. . :o

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nullable My mistake, i meant 3 out of each 100 members. . :o

You are excused :p, to be honest, it's not the fact that they cannot code which annoys me, it's the fact that they THINK they can, and try to lure other people into believing it.

Anyhow, I shall leave korvacs' thread alone for now, have fun =D

Quote:

Originally Posted by © Haydz You are excused :p, to be honest, it's not the fact that they cannot code which annoys me, it's the fact that they THINK they can, and try to lure other people into believing it. Anyhow, I shall leave korvacs' thread alone for now, have fun =D

I personally think that the problem is that people cant measure their limits, I can code to a certain level, but not as good as you guys though.

About the NPCs, the second option seems better to me :P