Isn't Hearthstone Pay2win ?

Naxx changed everything. The easiest way to legend is mage. Jaina doesent need much expensive cards. Remember if you have 51% win ratio you'll be in legendary only depends on time you spend in game. For me Hearthstone is 40% luck 40% cards and 20% skill

i got a legendary in my free pack..

Nope,definitely not p2w,ppl pay and still loses a lot lol

5 Legendaries (2x Ragnaros, 1x Mukka, 1x Prophet Velen, 1x Jaraxxus) and like 17 Epics (3 Golden Epics) and many golden rares from 42 packs for me.. First time luck in my life .__.

It's just RNG based

Yes

Popular streamers have already proven that you can get Legend using F2p (hardly any dust cost) decks, furthermore some of the continuous best decks cost hardly any dust (Zoo, Hunter). So it certainly isn't p2w but having all the cards does give you more options and will make the game a lot more fun.

In my opinion Hearthstone isnt a P2W.Its a lot easier with money yes, but u can get the same things with playing a lot of hearthstone so it isnt P2W.

Trump proofed 6 times that its not pay to win.
he reached with the basic decks 6times without spending one cent, legendary with 6 different accounts.

pay2win means that you can get items for money, which are not aquirable without money, and this is not the fact.

the only difference between spenders and free players on hearthstone is the time spend.
you have the choice to pay, or invest time.

this is the real free 2 play strategie, lost by so many companies.
blizzard, riot and R2Games are one of the only companies atm who are really providing the real free 2 play.

i could puke if i am reading such a bullshit of kids who don't have a clue about the gaming scene and calling lol or hs a p2w...

R2Games not pay to win? not sure about that...

also there are alot of games that are hosted by other companies thats not pay2win.

Atm every game is P2W in a greater or lesser extent.

Agreed with Changelle.
Heartstone IS Pay2win, but it fades away once you've played in over 2 months or so.
Look at it this way:
2 completely new players begin to play Heartstone.
The first one uses money, the second one doesn't.

After, let's say 10 hours, they're going to 1v1.

The first player has bought multiple packs, created a deck with rares and legendaries.
The second player has bought maybe 5-6 packs, with only 2 rares in them.

Who will win? - The guy which paid of course (Unless RNG takes over the game completely, which is less likely).

Just giving my 2 cents ^_^

I playing since beta from time to time and think:
- If a none legendary deck plays against a legendary; the legendary wins at least 7 out of 10 games.
- Mostly the game is about card draw luck while playing; if you not draw your FIREBALL when you need it or what ever you fall back and maybe lose
- Also: The Solo adventure cards a so good at the moment. you need to spend 700gold each wing. if you farm this gold for ages without pay 15€ to unlock all you get them later then casher. BUT: if you go for ranked or stuff you definitly loose because you not got the Cards which your Opponent got

If still a guy thinks you can reach legendary with a full Basic deck he should proove with video or card list. Also ist obvious: If you are not pro in hearthstone you not reach legendary with that deck but at least everyone could get to rank 10++

if you want to play this game normal you need to pay at least 50e,cause with less than 70-80 opened packs you cant do a fck. pay2win game