If you want a good CO related C++ reference, you should just take a look at the Eudemons client/server source code, it's publicly available. Don't think it's allowed to be posted here because of copyrights though
Worth noting that its a good CO source, but the code is awful.Quote:
If you want a good CO related C++ reference, you should just take a look at the Eudemons client/server source code, it's publicly available. Don't think it's allowed to be posted here because of copyrights though
Or this:Quote:
If you want a good CO related C++ reference, you should just take a look at the Eudemons client/server source code, it's publicly available. Don't think it's allowed to be posted here because of copyrights though
that's what im actually doing :D still trying to fully understand hybrids, some stuff isn't clear and im so tempted to ask but still trying more on my own XDQuote:
Or this:
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
And this:
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
Thank god somebody else agrees with me.Quote:
I've nerver really looked at Hybrid converted source, but bone's one isn't a good reference.
Anybody saying that bone's source is good, or fine, is a poor C++ developer.Quote:
Thank god somebody else agrees with me. [...]
Mhm, I wouldn't say 1000-3000% :rolleyes: It's far from being exceptional. TQ's code is fine, and the code is only good as reference.Quote:
The code is still 1000-3000% better than 99.99999999999998% of anything ever released here on epvp :)
Well, I think there is NO good reference of CO2 source. Plus, if it's Managed-C++, it's kind of unrelated.Quote:
mine was aimed at just experimenting with managed c++, I wouldn't call it a goof ref' either lol
Have you actually downloaded and looked at most of the releases here on epvp? Most, 9/10 at least, of the private servers are ridiculously poorly designed and written. I'm not judging though, designing and coding a private server isn't really a one or two man job.Quote:
Mhm, I wouldn't say 1000-3000% :rolleyes: It's far from being exceptional. TQ's code is fine, and the code is only good as reference.
Are you kidding? Its good in the sense that its the closest thing to the legit conquer source code available, but have you actually ever tried going through it? Its a pretty awful example of C++, beaten only by Bone's source, and that's saying something.Quote:
The code is still 1000-3000% better than 99.99999999999998% of anything ever released here on epvp :)