Wow you still don't get it... Of course a exe can be a key logger. But if you had a brain you would realise that this exe has no chance of being one.
Fast/Auto cooker
02/03/2012 11:33
jas161#16
02/03/2012 11:58
kotarou3#17
How about you explain why it can't be one?Quote:
Wow you still don't get it... Of course a exe can be a key logger. But if you had a brain you would realise that this exe has no chance of being one.
02/03/2012 12:49
jas161#18
:facepalm: The size...Quote:
02/03/2012 14:47
kotarou3#19
I can make keyloggers smaller than that. I'm not gonna bother though, because I already have one that is smaller
02/03/2012 18:36
Nosirrom#20
Kid, really, stop talking BS. You're going to get called on it when you talk it.Quote:
You may normally deal with shit made with VB or some such tools where the filesize is fluffed out by a lot of unneeded libraries and default files that are included (just open some VB program with Resource Hacker and check how many files are stuffed into it that aren't actually used), but when people write actual keyloggers they're not doing it with introductory tools, they're most often coding that shit in a language that doesn't fluff up the size.
Examples?
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
That specifically warns against keyloggers over 50KB as being more noticeable to users, which obviously implies that ones under 50KB are better. This statement wouldn't make sense if there weren't any under 50KB. :P
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
Here's one remote keylogger's FAQ stating the filesize should be around 100KB.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
Here's another keylogger, under 100KB.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
Even publicly-accessible locally-run IM keyloggers can be under 100KB, there's two listed there (a 50KB and a 95KB).
07/06/2023 10:18
Thadule#21
Ran 2 separate scans and here are the results for flags.
Site: VirusTotal (recommended by this site):
Vendor: TheHacker
Result: Posible_Worm32
Site: MetaDefender
Engine: RocketCyber
Result: Confidence_97
Site: MetaDefender
Engine: Scrutiny
Result: Malware
Not saying this is actually dangerous but that is all that those 2 sites found. I will test it on a virtual machine and see what happens. I probably won't be replying but I figured this issue can be laid to rest finally. For all I know this being such an old file probably doesn't even work anymore since it seems to be older than Windows 10 entirely let alone the current version of the game.
The results are in from my personal tests, this software DOES NOT work anymore. that and the fact that it tried and failed to link to a could server tells me that I will be doing a DEEP scan of my computer. This program is not trustworthy or working anymore so don't waste your time with it people. Jas161 posted a malware/virus and should not be trusted in the future by anybody.
Site: VirusTotal (recommended by this site):
Vendor: TheHacker
Result: Posible_Worm32
Site: MetaDefender
Engine: RocketCyber
Result: Confidence_97
Site: MetaDefender
Engine: Scrutiny
Result: Malware
Not saying this is actually dangerous but that is all that those 2 sites found. I will test it on a virtual machine and see what happens. I probably won't be replying but I figured this issue can be laid to rest finally. For all I know this being such an old file probably doesn't even work anymore since it seems to be older than Windows 10 entirely let alone the current version of the game.
The results are in from my personal tests, this software DOES NOT work anymore. that and the fact that it tried and failed to link to a could server tells me that I will be doing a DEEP scan of my computer. This program is not trustworthy or working anymore so don't waste your time with it people. Jas161 posted a malware/virus and should not be trusted in the future by anybody.