Searching For Hoster

Heres my points of all the post's of this thread.

1. Why does it matter if he gives the source,this "edited" source is either stealarchers source or whatever he was called,and alot of people got it,and it is no major edits or fixing onto it.

2. You can get the source,not all,but mostly of it by just cracking ( if thats the right word,forgot the correct one,) the .exe,this can be done manually ( hard ) , or made by a program Microsoft created,and it can crack onto C++,C# and some more. To become safe,buy an program ( forgot what its called *sigh* ) that like safes your .exe,and no1 can crack it. Easy as that.

Emme

Quote:

Originally Posted by emildayan1 Heres my points of all the post's of this thread. 1. Why does it matter if he gives the source,this "edited" source is either stealarchers source or whatever he was called,and alot of people got it,and it is no major edits or fixing onto it. 2. You can get the source,not all,but mostly of it by just cracking ( if thats the right word,forgot the correct one,) the .exe,this can be done manually ( hard ) , or made by a program Microsoft created,and it can crack onto C++,C# and some more. To become safe,buy an program ( forgot what its called *sigh* ) that like safes your .exe,and no1 can crack it. Easy as that. Emme

you point "1." is the same like what i said in the first page

and your point "2." you think that someone will buy programs to crack it?:p and you think that lightruler is that smart? (i saw some posts of him OMG XD)
and the name is not cracking:p but decompiling;) (or something)

@Emme Well he worked on it so his work isn't priceless... Also for you is just one more edited source with only little bugs fixed, but he spent his time on it so please appreciate that.
@Mouse>Pro Like tao said you can restore the source from the debug -.-

Quote:

Originally Posted by glupkotrup @Emme Well he worked on it so his work isn't priceless... Also for you is just one more edited source with only little bugs fixed, but he spent his time on it so please appreciate that. @Mouse>Pro Like tao said you can restore the source from the debug -.-

yeah but you cant decompile it full:p (i think, tell me if im wrong ;))

True you can't, but you can get most of it...

Quote:

Originally Posted by glupkotrup @Emme Well he worked on it so his work isn't priceless... Also for you is just one more edited source with only little bugs fixed, but he spent his time on it so please appreciate that. @Mouse>Pro Like tao said you can restore the source from the debug -.-

Hurrah for decompileage?

If lightruler wants a crappy source of LOTF with like 2 edits, he can have it... I'd give it to him... It'd just delete some important files on his computer also >.>

Quote:

Originally Posted by tao4229 Hurrah for decompileage? If lightruler wants a crappy source of LOTF with like 2 edits, he can have it... I'd give it to him... It'd just delete some important files on his computer also >.>

haha big fight over nothing