[BOT & PROXY] Conquer A.I. - The 2nd Generation COFarmer & JProxy

07/15/2011 05:46 HaunterPwnsGengar#16
soooooooooooooooooooo its just another pay to use Conquer bot..?
07/15/2011 05:59 Yup Stigs#17
Quote:
Originally Posted by HaunterPwnsGengar View Post
soooooooooooooooooooo its just another pay to use Conquer bot..?
no fucking shit?
07/15/2011 06:31 InfamousNoone#18
Quote:
Originally Posted by InfamousNoone View Post
Sadly, as I'm sure you're well aware many people lack the basic ability to read.
@ Poster above me. Nuff said.
07/15/2011 12:16 Santa#19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coatl 2.0 View Post
doubt there botjail protection is any better then the "1st gen COF" Lol.
At this point in time its better than your isn't it.
07/15/2011 12:39 TheBoyWhoLost#20
Isn't it the 3rd generation?

1st. BCO
2nd. CoF & JProxy
3rd. ConquerAI

I remember being a moderator at BCO before i left cause i was to busy with school.. Quiet funny i know it better then the OP.
07/15/2011 12:40 Trigorio#21
Quote:
Originally Posted by StarBucks View Post
At this point in time its better than your isn't it.
We haven't had a single person botjailed, so how exactly are you thinking?
07/15/2011 12:48 rabge#22
awsome bot
07/15/2011 12:49 lostsolder05#23
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trigorio View Post
We haven't had a single person botjailed, so how exactly are you thinking?
Remind me how you know this?
07/15/2011 12:51 Chalkie#24
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trigorio View Post
We haven't had a single person botjailed, so how exactly are you thinking?
Isn't there a whole 10+ page thread dedicated to botjails on your forums?
07/15/2011 12:58 Trigorio#25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chalkie View Post
Isn't there a whole 10+ page thread dedicated to botjails on your forums?
And have you looked at the dates? I though we were talking about botjails caused by insecurity in the software itself, not being caught by GMs, or am I wrong?
07/15/2011 12:59 InfamousNoone#26
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBoyWhoLost View Post
Isn't it the 3rd generation?

1st. BCO
2nd. CoF & JProxy
3rd. ConquerAI

I remember being a moderator at BCO before i left cause i was to busy with school.. Quiet funny i know it better then the OP.
I consider BCO and COF the same thing.
I do not consider COF 2.0 and COF 1.0 the same thing.

Therefore, 2nd generation. Even if we were to per say consider that what you've said is correct, JProxy never has a successor or 2nd generation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trigorio View Post
And have you looked at the dates? I though we were talking about botjails caused by insecurity in the software itself, not being caught by GMs, or am I wrong?
How slowly (or how much) do your savor your cake?
Arguably with that said, COF 2.0 has had no issues when it's come to being botjailed due to the software. At least, none where we haven't warned people that doing x will get you bot jailed and people have still do it. This is simply because I don't have the administrative privileges to put out an update, where as a bot managed by solely yourself; if you ever find something wrong -- You can instantly correct it. If I find something wrong, I have to wait until I can contact John and simply post up a warning. Of course, people fail to read.
07/15/2011 13:04 TheBoyWhoLost#27
Quote:
Originally Posted by InfamousNoone View Post
I consider BCO and COF the same thing.
I do not consider COF 2.0 and COF 1.0 the same thing.

Therefore, 2nd generation.
as you said by yourslef, it's how you concider it. But in fact it's the 3rd ;)
07/15/2011 13:07 Trigorio#28
Quote:
Originally Posted by InfamousNoone View Post
Arguably with that said, COF 2.0 has had no issues when it's come to being botjailed due to the software. At least, none where we haven't warned people that doing x will get you bot jailed and people have still do it.
You know, it doesn't matter wether you warned them or not, your software was still the very cause of them being botjailed, and then blaming it on their reading skills is just low.
07/15/2011 13:09 Korvacs#29
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBoyWhoLost View Post
as you said by yourslef, it's how you concider it. But in fact it's the 3rd ;)
Did you do any physical work on any of those products? No.

Do you have any idea what the source looks like for any of those products? No.

So how would you know what fact is when it comes to these products?
07/15/2011 13:11 InfamousNoone#30
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBoyWhoLost View Post
as you said by yourslef, it's how you concider it. But in fact it's the 3rd ;)
If I have John post here stating that BCO and COF are considered the same generation will that put a cork in your mouth? Both are considered part of the "1.0" family, where as COF 2 (Conquer AI) are considered part of the "2.0" (hence 2nd Generation) family.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trigorio View Post
You know, it doesn't matter wether you warned them or not, your software was still the very cause of them being botjailed, and then blaming it on their reading skills is just low.
You're going to assert that nobody has ever been botjailed due to your software? I recall the mass botjailings when TQ would post lists of people who were botjailed, and people on my server stating they used COGenius. Please, put clientless back into your bot and post a warning saying that using it will get botjailed -- Leave it for lets say, a day, let's see how many people get botjailed.