Who sad that...

Quote:

Originally Posted by evanxxxm unknownone@ if CO change key, they change if people figure out, they figure what does it mean "A good knowledge of ASM and few hours is all that's needed"? it doesnt mean anything its just like people saying, "well, a good programmer can easily make something similar or better than SV in few hours" is that good programmer you? me? someone we know? someone that willing to spend time? as simple as a AHK encrypter and a short 10 digit key Interesting..... Remember when the FANTOM was released(SV small screen, a puzzebird release)(short 10 digit key) (you don't fail at life... if you get my point)It's people like you that speak with a voice of reason even a brute force program will take hours to do it (10^72+ possible combo) (not considering if its sending to server, server will stop u) yea sure, we can ask the "good knowledge ASM" guy, right? the fact is that, the CID team does not succeed (yet or forever)Do they Fail????? and if they succeed, and willing to release it to public. we will back to those massive proxy users days. CO team may or may not change the key/encryption, but if they do, is the CID team ready for another challenge? Very good question.... and Point. (Get's you think about something that was said on the CO forum) Interesting how they (TQ let's information be posted about the "Proxys" on there.. On that's right Tq doesnt check their own forums... I guess they fail, much more simple to come here or Google!:) using hundreds of hours and what do they get back? some people yelling "VIRUS" or something "SUCKS, NOT WORKING" or just a button of "thanks", o really great (for details, u can check few pages inside the CID proxy thread) Or right on the front page ! We call them namesayers( NOOBS)<--- look that up... its old word. you'll have to look in the urban dictionary to find it LOL sometimes for a programmer input * 100 = outcome * 1 thats very discouraging Very Discouraging to say the least. I've learn a lot just from programers,( Hackers n Such) I was able to fix a program that has worked since 4354... :) With outcome and Discouraging as the namesayers are. why would i post it. or even a DYI... besides, seems like they get very little support from Underground. or maybe the fact is that no one in underground is such a "good ASM" guy that can figure the code out.

Quote:

Originally Posted by evanxxxm they will give up eventually CO will definitely change the decrypt if massive proxy arrives again personally i dont think it is a hard thing to change the decrypt code compare to one has to figure out what is the decrypt code and create a encrypt program and do u think they will spend another couple hundreds of hours trying to figure out if CO change the decryption again and again? stick with memory bots and pixel bots are guaranteer working

Quote:

Originally Posted by evanxxxm unknownone@ if CO change key, they change if people figure out, they figure what does it mean "A good knowledge of ASM and few hours is all that's needed"? it doesnt mean anything its just like people saying, "well, a good programmer can easily make something similar or better than SV in few hours" is that good programmer you? me? someone we know? someone that willing to spend time? as simple as a AHK encrypter and a short 10 digit key even a brute force program will take hours to do it (10^72+ possible combo) (not considering if its sending to server, server will stop u) yea sure, we can ask the "good knowledge ASM" guy, right? the fact is that, the CID team does not succeed (yet or forever) and if they succeed, and willing to release it to public. we will back to those massive proxy users days. CO team may or may not change the key/encryption, but if they do, is the CID team ready for another challenge? using hundreds of hours and what do they get back? some people yelling "VIRUS" or something "SUCKS, NOT WORKING" or just a button of "thanks", o really great (for details, u can check few pages inside the CID proxy thread) sometimes for a programmer input * 100 = outcome * 1 thats very discouraging besides, seems like they get very little support from Underground. or maybe the fact is that no one in underground is such a "good ASM" guy that can figure the code out.

Quote:

Originally Posted by evanxxxm unknownone@ exactly, when the encryptions are easy, they can do it when it is slightly complicated 1. give up (maybe dont even think it worths time cracking it) 2. Wait for other people to crack it, steal the method and create its own proxy 3. like now, trying, but seems no progress i have nothing against proxy. i always think proxy are > other type of bots. if the CID team can figure it out, for a noob programmer like me, i will also feel good that they can achieve something that normally cant on the other hand, i also feel sorry for them because most people can not provide any help to them. not only that, but people are just whining about "HURRY UP" "WHEN IS IT COMING OUT" "IT SHOULD BE EASY, COME ON" and thats very discouraging to them (at least thats what i get from your idea that they are no good ASM programmer, and if they were it should be piece of cake that can be done in few hours. i know that might be a true fact, but they are trying their best, so i think they deserve no complaints. thats why i got a little bit mad) at the end, if they can figure out, but decided not to release it in public i will also support that idea from the feedbacks, time consuming and lack of "good" ASM knowledge, thats what holding them back. of course, deciding whether or not it is "wasting time" or "enjoying" for cracking the encryption is totally depend on them.