About banwaves.

10/10/2012 17:23 genesisVI#211
Quote:
Originally Posted by кev View Post
You don't need to do that. The reason why I asked is because if you're on up-to-date client, the logging behaves exactly the same regardless of the GG version.
oh not exactly :D

it acts like a filter .. only necessary packets are sent back by my client in order to run normally ...
10/10/2012 20:23 OmegaArma#212
Sorry, but i will not release safe version.
It's simply a stupid idea, EST would patch it in no time, and i've made few promises.
So again sorry, you have to sort it out on your self.
10/11/2012 00:58 jhayden21503#213
acid link new version pls
10/11/2012 03:21 kheem_t#214
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmegaArma View Post
Sorry, but i will not release safe version.
It's simply a stupid idea, EST would patch it in no time, and i've made few promises.
So again sorry, you have to sort it out on your self.

hmm... disappointing but then again, who are we to force someone to do something he doesnt want to right?
10/11/2012 05:13 ghens#215
DO NOT USE ANY HACKS WITH NORMAL CLIENT! OR BYPASSED CABALMAIN!

What does this means?
what normal client means and bypass cabalmain?

Is using sir bartbilf bypass still safe?
10/11/2012 12:16 кev#216
Quote:
Originally Posted by genesisVI View Post
oh not exactly :D

it acts like a filter .. only necessary packets are sent back by my client in order to run normally ...
Yeah, I see your point now. Your previous request for the older GG versions threw me off.

Quote:
Originally Posted by joxof View Post
What do you mean, it's useless thing to cut out that pesky function from cabalmain normal client?
I didn't say that exactly. But there's no point in removing it and releasing a modified executable since they just counter it with patch which leads to endless cat and mouse between us and them. Plus it would most likely fool people thinking that you can't get banned while using a executable with the logging removed. They only bother to read the posts with a thought after they taste the banhammer, look at the dlog thread in release section for a prime example.

In the end, there's more feasible options available than the one this discussion is biased to.
10/11/2012 18:36 tarub#217
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmegaArma View Post
Sorry, but i will not release safe version.
It's simply a stupid idea, EST would patch it in no time, and i've made few promises.
So again sorry, you have to sort it out on your self.
this is what the people and leechers waiting to hear from omega. pigrolac are u satisfied now?
10/11/2012 21:49 joxof#218
anyway, congrats! and condolence to pigrolac :D
10/12/2012 08:59 pigrolac#219
disapoitning alright delete this thread
10/12/2012 14:25 OmegaArma#220
Quote:
Originally Posted by pigrolac View Post
disapoitning alright delete this thread
Well, why?
In this thread ppl can discuss about banwaves, that ugly log system etc.
Clever ppl will post hints how to avoid being banned, and not so clever ppl will take advantage of those hints.
Only stupid ppl will cry and complain:)
10/12/2012 18:38 skepjen#221
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmegaArma View Post
Well, why?
In this thread ppl can discuss about banwaves, that ugly log system etc.
Clever ppl will post hints how to avoid being banned, and not so clever ppl will take advantage of those hints.
Only stupid ppl will cry and complain:)
thank god, all thanks to this thread, all of my character are still intact, including my dummy accounts :D
10/13/2012 01:41 bartbilf#222
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmegaArma View Post
Well, why?
In this thread ppl can discuss about banwaves, that ugly log system etc.
Clever ppl will post hints how to avoid being banned, and not so clever ppl will take advantage of those hints.
Only stupid ppl will cry and complain:)
Close it ;p

PS: that was sarcasm
PSS: this was spam
PSSS: this third PS is totaly random
10/13/2012 19:19 кev#223
Quote:
Originally Posted by joxof View Post
Now i know why "internal" hacks get flagged and banned. Well, that's because ESTsoft updates cabalmain.exe to "watch" suspicious locations for unauthorized changes [you called it pesky function].

P.S.: I think "internal" hacks work by injecting a DLL into the cabalmain.exe process at such locations and modifying them.

[Credits] :
Thanks to OmegaArma :handsdown:
That's easily the most obscure and vague post I've seen in a while.
10/13/2012 20:18 Acid#224
Quote:
Originally Posted by кev View Post
That's easily the most obscure and vague post I've seen in a while.
lol I actually thought the same when I read it.
10/14/2012 06:17 iloveallen#225
is ce can detect ? how to prevent hack detection :)