Best Undetected CS2 Cheat currently?

Quote:

Originally Posted by iTexas Has anyone Used Tabzware Cartel Cheats? I understand some have spite with Tabz himself but the cheat I would say looks quite good?

There's many better offerings than a YTer cheat, that's the truth.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 Zebleer just announced his MW2 and MW3 beta cheats for detected sadly.:pimp:

I see. Sigh. RIP. We will see what happens to my account.

FWIW I did not inject MW3 beta on my cheat Main.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bluewhale22 Glad to hear then, wasn't doubting him just informing what I currently know of it. There's no point atm to trying iniuria if you simply want more features, it's very barebones with only visuals and aimbot - link with all the featues : iniuria(dot)us/forum/showthread.php?8785-Iniuria-CS2-Full Triggerbot I would say is one of the best one's out right now, but not by that much. If PO is sufficient for you, then iniuria will basically be that but with more consistency. Aimbot is also good, a lot more customization than PO since it's an internal. It is something you'd more than likely enjoy way more than an external aimbot. Only reason I would switch from PO to iniuria, at the moment, is for the aimbot; otherwise I don't see why you would want to spend more money for a very similarly performing cheat.

Thanks a lot friend.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 Zebleer just announced his MW2 and MW3 beta cheats for detected sadly.:pimp:

You posted here too? :awesome:

I guess I will paste over my reply to you from the other thread:

"I do not agree with your use of :pimp: here :feelsbadman:

You should know, I am not ashamed about what just happened with COD. PO was the last popular provider standing against Ricochet. Ricochet had been implemented with a kernel driver since over 2 years ago & PO was one of the top providers when it was added. Then, over 2 years, PO got even bigger. Ricochet couldn't do anything against PO for more than 2 years other than a sloppy trick detection in their September 27 driver update

I assure you that this will never happen with CS2 but first let me say some things about COD since you brought that up

1. I found what was detected & fixed it
2. I am hardening against similar detections
3. I have implemented a security event trip system. Any time any concerning changes occur with MW2/MW3, injections will automatically shut off & I will get a notification. I will then review the changes & clear them before turning injections back on. This means PO COD will never auto update again but will be much more secure
4. I am coming back stronger than ever & plan to outlast competitors in the COD market once again

As for CS2,

1. VAC has no meaningful kernel-mode component right now at all
2. Even if they added one, I would still be the best option for CS2 cheating, just as I was for COD
3. I will get ahead on CS2 and implement the same bypassing and security measures as I have for COD. Keep in mind my CS2 cheat actually has a stronger bypass than COD so I will implement this bypass onto COD but COD has more security measures so I will implement them over here, including the trip. It's overkill for a user-mode based AC but w/e
4. Since my cheat is extremely humanized, especially with recommended settings, it would be very hard for the CS2 anti-cheat to do anything server sided to PO"

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 Explain why. :pimp:

people forgot how many times iniuria got clapped during 2016 along with aimware, interwebz and unityhacks. They only became successful when valve has given up on detecting cheats.

(interwebz stopped updating their shit, unityhacks is gone by now after 2017/18 Valve gave up on their anti cheat and came back in 2020 with red trust and whatnot)

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebleer You posted here too? :awesome: I guess I will paste over my reply to you from the other thread: "I do not agree with your use of :pimp: here :feelsbadman: You should know, I am not ashamed about what just happened with COD. PO was the last popular provider standing against Ricochet. Ricochet had been implemented with a kernel driver since over 2 years ago & PO was one of the top providers when it was added. Then, over 2 years, PO got even bigger. Ricochet couldn't do anything against PO for more than 2 years other than a sloppy trick detection in their September 27 driver update I assure you that this will never happen with CS2 but first let me say some things about COD since you brought that up 1. I found what was detected & fixed it 2. I am hardening against similar detections 3. I have implemented a security event trip system. Any time any concerning changes occur with MW2/MW3, injections will automatically shut off & I will get a notification. I will then review the changes & clear them before turning injections back on. This means PO COD will never auto update again but will be much more secure 4. I am coming back stronger than ever & plan to outlast competitors in the COD market once again As for CS2, 1. VAC has no meaningful kernel-mode component right now at all 2. Even if they added one, I would still be the best option for CS2 cheating, just as I was for COD 3. I will get ahead on CS2 and implement the same bypassing and security measures as I have for COD. Keep in mind my CS2 cheat actually has a stronger bypass than COD so I will implement this bypass onto COD but COD has more security measures so I will implement them over here, including the trip. It's overkill for a user-mode based AC but w/e 4. Since my cheat is extremely humanized, especially with recommended settings, it would be very hard for the CS2 anti-cheat to do anything server sided to PO"

Guess i will do the same. :rolleyes:

I used the emoji because i like it that’s all.

The reason why i mentioned PO being detected in their COD cheat, was because you have “bragged” about it, in your posts here in the Counter Strike section of ElitePvpers, which is also okay.

Quote:

Originally Posted by astroware people forgot how many times iniuria got clapped during 2016 along with aimware, interwebz and unityhacks. They only became successful when valve has given up on detecting cheats. (interwebz stopped updating their shit, unityhacks is gone by now after 2017/18 Valve gave up on their anti cheat and came back in 2020 with red trust and whatnot)

That is true, but they stopped getting detected after v4 and also valve never stopped tageting providers, there is just so many that they wanna target known bypasses instead of “unknown” ones.

When you compare Iniuria to other cheats from that Era of csgo, no other cheat is still relevant in the same way.

Think it’s unfair to conclude something today that happened 5-8 years ago, wouldn’t you agree on that? :pimp:

Quote:

Originally Posted by astroware people forgot how many times iniuria got clapped during 2016 along with aimware, interwebz and unityhacks. They only became successful when valve has given up on detecting cheats. (interwebz stopped updating their shit, unityhacks is gone by now after 2017/18 Valve gave up on their anti cheat and came back in 2020 with red trust and whatnot)

Uhm, Unity didnt got clapped that often tbh. They got clapped 2015 and 2020 when they stopped updating and discontinued the project. They even survived the VMT hooking detection..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aewbin Uhm, Unity didnt got clapped that often tbh. They got clapped 2015 and 2020 when they stopped updating and discontinued the project. They even survived the VMT hooking detection..

unity did have 2 detections in 2016 (big wave where all 3 public providers got clapped along w iniuria September 2016) and the wave after that again. Then recode released pretty shortly after that less than 1 year I believe, and detections were gone for the most part, it sadly died.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 Guess i will do the same. :rolleyes: I used the emoji because i like it that’s all. The reason why i mentioned PO being detected in their COD cheat, was because you have “bragged” about it, in your posts here in the Counter Strike section of ElitePvpers, which is also okay. That is true, but they stopped getting detected after v4 and also valve never stopped tageting providers, there is just so many that they wanna target known bypasses instead of “unknown” ones. When you compare Iniuria to other cheats from that Era of csgo, no other cheat is still relevant in the same way. Think it’s unfair to conclude something today that happened 5-8 years ago, wouldn’t you agree on that? :pimp:

no, history teaches us a lot, that's the way I see it - tho I have to give you credits, in regards to the PO topic, the brag was there

Quote:

Originally Posted by astroware unity did have 2 detections in 2016 (big wave where all 3 public providers got clapped along w iniuria September 2016) and the wave after that again. Then recode released pretty shortly after that less than 1 year I believe, and detections were gone for the most part, it sadly died. no, history teaches us a lot, that's the way I see it

That’s kinda stupid, i get what you are saying, but in this context i believe it to be stupid, i only know 1 csgo cheats provider, that have the same age as iniuria and haven’t been detected, and all of those cheats are in my opinion really bad compared to iniuria. :pimp:

-edit
Indeed. PO was bragging a lot about his COD cheats and i could understand why, but as they say. The higher you climb the harder you will fall.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 That’s kinda stupid, i get what you are saying, but in this context i believe it to be stupid, i only know 1 csgo cheats provider, that have the same age as iniuria and haven’t been detected, and all of those cheats are in my opinion really bad compared to iniuria. :pimp:

I simply do not believe that everybody should buy Iniuria cus it managed to survive the years when valve didn't give two shits, but when valve was trying to combat cheating it didn't stand a chance, that is what I'm referring to.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 The reason why i mentioned PO being detected in their COD cheat, was because you have “bragged” about it, in your posts here in the Counter Strike section of ElitePvpers, which is also okay.

Sure but why would anything change? PO still has the best record on COD out of any popular cheat provider. Why can't I still brag about it? It's not like if a fighter has 50 wins & 0 losses, then loses once, he is suddenly a bum?

I understand what you are saying that I used it to benefit CS2 so it's fair for you to use it for the opposite, but I still plan to use my COD record & new security after this detection to promote my CS2 cheat value...

Quote:

Originally Posted by astroware in regards to the PO topic, the brag was there

It still will be

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 -edit Indeed. PO was bragging a lot about his COD cheats and i could understand why, but as they say. The higher you climb the harder you will fall.

I already had a better UD record than every popular provider when I got hit which means I still will now. Of course, with a detection things must change. Aside from hardening against similar detections, I will have to auto shut off injections anytime any update of any sort occurs with COD so I have time to evaluate it before my users inject. This is my worst nightmare for many reasons, but I will do it. & in the future I will begin doing it with CS2 as well (though without any meaningful kernel-mode component I am not worried)

Quote:

Originally Posted by astroware I simply do not believe that everybody should buy Iniuria cus it managed to survive the years when valve didn't give two shits, but when valve was trying to combat cheating it didn't stand a chance, that is what I'm referring to.

True, but i think the people that are buying iniuria wants the bedt overall cheating experience and not the “most” Secure cheat there is on the market. :pimp:

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebleer Sure but why would anything change? PO still has the best record on COD out of any popular cheat provider. Why can't I still brag about it? It's not like if a fighter has 50 wins & 0 losses, then loses once, he is suddenly a bum? I understand what you are saying that I used it to benefit CS2 so it's fair for you to use it for the opposite, but I still plan to use my COD record & new security after this detection to promote my CS2 cheat value... It still will be I already had a better UD record than every popular provider when I got hit which means I still will now. Of course, with a detection things must change. Aside from hardening against similar detections, I will have to auto shut off injections anytime any update of any sort occurs with COD so I have time to evaluate it before my users inject. This is my worst nightmare for many reasons, but I will do it. & in the future I will begin doing it with CS2 as well (though without any meaningful kernel-mode component I am not worried)

I never said anything will change, i simply replied and stated that PO COD have been detected, im not here to “hurt” or talk bad things about PO, i wrote here to make some things clear, so people doesn’t expect something that isn’t true anymore, and as i wrote before i only did it because you where bragged about it when you recommended for CS2 recommendations in this part of the Forum. I even said in your telegram that i believe PO will be one of the biggest External providers in the CS scene, but how many that will choose external over Internal we will still see about. :pimp:

I hope you will have time to maintain all of your cheats if you gotta check security manually.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 I never said anything will change, i simply replied and stated that PO COD have been detected, im not here to “hurt” or talk bad things about PO, i wrote here to make some things clear, so people doesn’t expect something that isn’t true anymore, and as i wrote before i only did it because you where bragged about it when you recommended for CS2 recommendations in this part of the Forum. I even said in your telegram that i believe PO will be one of the biggest External providers in the CS scene, but how many that will choose external over Internal we will still see about. :pimp: I hope you will have time to maintain all of your cheats if you gotta check security manually.

Oh my bad then this has been a huge misunderstanding. I thought you were using the DT to disprove the messages that said PO would be good for CS2 but you were disproving the claim that PO was never DT on COD which is factual

Sorry that mistake is entirely on me

If I may provide an excuse, I have both aged 20 years in the last 5 days & have not slept much at all :feelsbadman::feelsbadman:

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebleer Oh my bad then this has been a huge misunderstanding. I thought you were using the DT to disprove the messages that said PO would be good for CS2 but you were disproving the claim that PO was never DT on COD which is factual Sorry that mistake is entirely on me If I may provide an excuse, I have both aged 20 years in the last 5 days & have not slept much at all :feelsbadman::feelsbadman:

Haha it is all okay, i hope you will have time to get some more sleep in the coming days, when the stuff with COD settles. :awesome:

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 Haha it is all okay, i hope you will have time to get some more sleep in the coming days, when the stuff with COD settles. :awesome:

By the way, I am a bragging asshole, but I'm consistent

There are internals with great COD detection records who are doing CS2 (EO & IW) and I think they can brag the same as me about being a COD provider with a good record coming to CS2

Though I know IW has been around. I think both IW and EO became a lot more 1337 recently because they both have not so satisfying DT records in the past but recently wow

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebleer By the way, I am a bragging asshole, but I'm consistent There are internals with great COD detection records who are doing CS2 (EO & IW) and I think they can brag the same as me about being a COD provider with a good record coming to CS2 Though I know IW has been around. I think both IW and EO became a lot more 1337 recently because they both have not so satisfying DT records in the past but recently wow

Haha that’s also fine, nothing wrong bragging if you got something to brag about it.

Hmm maybe, i think EO is excused as they had Activision up their ass with lawsuit for years, but still managed to get out on the other side better from what i have heard.
IW im pretty sure they made CSGO cheats before making any for COD if i am not wrong, but they have been a decent provider for both stuff for a long time, i their COD cheats are the best internals cheats atm.

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebleer By the way, I am a bragging asshole, but I'm consistent There are internals with great COD detection records who are doing CS2 (EO & IW) and I think they can brag the same as me about being a COD provider with a good record coming to CS2 Though I know IW has been around. I think both IW and EO became a lot more 1337 recently because they both have not so satisfying DT records in the past but recently wow

IW got detected once, idk what u mean by 1337 and they got detected only 2 months before you have. (I am excluding the unlock all bs, since that has been communicated that it is not always safe to use)