Packet bot....

vuduclong0309 · 02/15/2013, 10:28

Well,... I want to learn about packet bot and how to make it. But I dont know where should i start and where i can learn about it. Can someone experienced give the newbie an instruction in it? I know a little about c++

Thanks

Requi · 02/15/2013, 10:46

Alright:

First you need a good language for packet bots. C++ is not really recommened.
I prefer VB.Net/C# or Java.
If you know C++ a bit, you can start with Java. Learn the language. WebRequest and TCP is important.

If you know this, you need a good Packet Sniffer.
WPE or Wireshark are good. Don't use Firefox or Chrome. If I remember right, jD said, that it don't accept dll importing, that you can't sniff.
Opera or Internet Explorer would be good.

If you have the packets, you must encrypt them. That is the most difficult part. The packets are very hard decrypted.
Just try and try, till you can login and it moves alone.

You can ask jD here in epvp too. Maybe he give you some tips, what the bot needs.

Regards,
ya Pony

L1m4ro · 02/15/2013, 13:00

If you know Java or consider learning in it, I can tell you that your job will be A LOT easier. I don't think anybody here will be able to help you with that language, but decrypting/encrypting the packets, as well as telling the bot what to do is releated just to parsing everything with the flash objects from DO.

However, your bot will be less functional at the end (compare IBOT with PBDO-BOT as an example). It's up to you

Good luck!!

»Barney« · 02/15/2013, 14:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by darkunited

If you know Java or consider learning in it, I can tell you that your job will be A LOT easier. I don't think anybody here will be able to help you with that language, but decrypting/encrypting the packets, as well as telling the bot what to do is releated just to parsing everything with the flash objects from DO.

However, your bot will be less functional at the end (compare IBOT with PBDO-BOT as an example). It's up to you

Good luck!!

That's stupid. PBDO didn't beat iBot because of the language, but because Profibot developers are lazy.

Get your facts right.

L1m4ro · 02/15/2013, 14:32

I said that JAVA is a lot easier to code a bot in and make it actually work, but compared to PBDO-BOT which is in C#, PBDO is really much more functional (and I think you know it).

That is true. And yes, I am sure that with 200 times more work the IBOT team can come out with a killing logic and features nobody have ever seen. But yeah, that's profibot!

»Barney« · 02/15/2013, 15:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by darkunited

I said that JAVA is a lot easier to code a bot in and make it actually work, but compared to PBDO-BOT which is in C#, PBDO is really much more functional (and I think you know it).

That is true. And yes, I am sure that with 200 times more work the IBOT team can come out with a killing logic and features nobody have ever seen. But yeah, that's profibot!

I know PBDO is better but not because of the language.

Your argument is invalid.

~~mayur_kulkarni~~ · 02/15/2013, 15:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by chichi011

I know PBDO is better but not because of the language.

Your argument is invalid.

your arguement is invalid =.=
and i bet you know nothing about programming

TheFallenAngel · 02/15/2013, 16:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by chichi011

That's stupid. PBDO didn't beat iBot because of the language, but because Profibot developers are lazy.

Get your facts right.

Quote:

Originally Posted by darkunited

I said that JAVA is a lot easier to code a bot in and make it actually work, but compared to PBDO-BOT which is in C#, PBDO is really much more functional (and I think you know it).

That is true. And yes, I am sure that with 200 times more work the IBOT team can come out with a killing logic and features nobody have ever seen. But yeah, that's profibot!

Quote:

Originally Posted by chichi011

I know PBDO is better but not because of the language.

Your argument is invalid.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mayur_kulkarni

your arguement is invalid =.=
and i bet you know nothing about programming

the difference between C# and java are the most minuscule things. if you know one you essentially know the other except for a few very small changes. nothing 2 seconds on google couldnt fix. so the comparison from ibot to PBDO, does not depend on the language but the amount of effort put into making the program, how you make it, and how you program it functon. end ofstory

L1m4ro · 02/15/2013, 16:31

Alright, let's stop the fight... Let's assume JAVA is the same thing as C# with the exactly same functionality... THE END.

musicmaker301 · 02/15/2013, 16:33

i need a darkorbit bot for free can you help

L1m4ro · 02/15/2013, 16:34

^ Unless you create one, no, we cannot help

»Barney« · 02/15/2013, 17:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by mayur_kulkarni

your arguement is invalid =.=
and i bet you know nothing about programming

Suck it. I don't say I am a .NET Cracker just because I know how to use a decompiler. Noob.

Klenix123 · 02/15/2013, 20:59

@Requi
Why is C++ not recommended?

C++ is as advisable as C#, VB.net and Java... I use every of them except Java and every of them has its own benefits...

Requi · 02/15/2013, 21:20

C++ have with the standard libraries(?) only console design. So it wouldn't be easy to control the bot.
You must type difficult commands in the console and can't see the Map, where the ship is. Or what it shoot etc.

Yes, there are libraries for GUI, but it's hard to make one and get it right working with a "Minimap".

Klenix123 · 02/15/2013, 21:29

Visual C++ has the same Form Designer like VC# and VB.net

Edit:
The Minimap is the most easiest thing^^