SOURCE CODE

2spesh4u · 09/06/2006, 15:50

Enjoy, reason is i dont care =)

**EDIT**
See text file few posts below

tsu · 09/06/2006, 16:21

Thanks, altho I alredy had it.
But you could've just put it in a .txt document.

recoiled · 09/06/2006, 16:26

*sigh* any money can decompile a .class
******* morons

2spesh4u · 09/06/2006, 16:26

I know i suck, its 12:30am just finished night shift watching servers for the last 9 hrs.
Saw alot of people upset that proxy was out in the open so i released source. Only the people who use the AB are the ones who dont want it public.

2spesh4u · 09/06/2006, 16:28

Quote:

Originally posted by recoiled@Sep 6 2006, 16:26
*sigh* any money can decompile a .class
******* morons

Atleast im a ******* moron that can communicate in english.
Whos any money

2spesh4u · 09/06/2006, 16:34

SOURCE CODE

prog4mer · 09/06/2006, 16:44

lol remove that fast, before tq get it and fix all easilie ! !

recoiled · 09/06/2006, 16:47

Quote:

Originally posted by 2spesh4u+Sep 7 2006, 01:28--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (2spesh4u @ Sep 7 2006, 01:28)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--recoiled@Sep 6 2006, 16:26
*sigh* any money can decompile a .class
******* morons

Atleast im a ******* moron that can communicate in english.
Whos any money

[/b][/quote]
i meant moron zzz, post the source code.. its TTPowers version anyway lol it sux0rs. anyone who has the aimbot released on epvp by stillanoob should read the topic that he created.

2spesh4u · 09/06/2006, 23:01

Most of the Aim Bots are **** anyway. Releasing source is not an issue because i dont see any leechers with remotely enough skill to know what to do with it.

As for posting source how hard is it to download the class files and decompile?

Macceth · 09/07/2006, 00:05

I hope CO do fix it, all you QOproxy users suck

stillnoob · 09/07/2006, 00:13

lol.
You guys who are trying to decompile .class really dont know anything about java.
Who said that have decompiled it, try to compile it again and post here ...
It will fail!!!

2spesh4u · 09/07/2006, 14:33

Quote:

Originally posted by stillnoob@Sep 7 2006, 00:13
lol.
You guys who are trying to decompile .class really dont know anything about java.
Who said that have decompiled it, try to compile it again and post here ...
It will fail!!!

Would you prefer i post the .class files? or would you prefer me to make you a personal tut about java and compilations? As it seems you have no idea about java on a developement level.
Oh and if you tried to compile the source as one class file then your dreaming

If you understood the code you would know this is slightly modified version of the QOPROXY you posted.

Why im actually responding im not sure, it could be because im sick of script kiddies and leechers who dont know **** and try and step forward.

%47%4f%20%46%55%43%4b%20%59%4f%55%52%53%45%4c%46

Im so sick of whiny *******. Let conquer die, if TQ actually wanted to make a profit they wouldnt have so many bugs.

P.S. Thanks for the Karma, atleast someone apreciates my 3 seconds of effort.

Wolvereness · 09/07/2006, 14:41

2spesh4u, stillnoob has a point. I don't know of any (free) java decompiler that will successfully decompile sourcecode with the ability to recompile straight (without it breaking). There are certain things that are challenging to decompile without flaw.

This is still dangerous though, you can look at the modifications, mess with the old sourcecode, and compile it yourself.... (Why I kept my sourcecode private for trusted members)

2spesh4u · 09/07/2006, 14:44

Quote:

Originally posted by Wolvereness@Sep 7 2006, 14:41
2spesh4u, stillnoob has a point. I don't know of any (free) java decompiler that will successfully decompile sourcecode with the ability to recompile straight (without it breaking). There are certain things that are challenging to decompile without flaw.

This is still dangerous though, you can look at the modifications, mess with the old sourcecode, and compile it yourself.... (Why I kept my sourcecode private for trusted members)

Well from your perspective i understand the issue in regards to the compiling, stillnoob might have repharsed his wording. However anyone who actually downloads the source should know simply what is required for compilation otherwise there would be no point in viewing the source.

recoiled · 09/08/2006, 05:25

google search JAD for .class decompiler
let people have the source code... the .class wasnt even protected... so whoopdy doo... case is people still gonaq be crying when they get hacked.. and guess who they gona blame... epvp